Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 10;3(1):e4519. doi: 10.32872/cpe.4519

Table 4. GSI Post Hoc Comparisons Using HSD Test on Age, Sex and Income, in Period 1 and 2.

Participants’ characteristics Period 1: GSI-27
Period 2: GSI-27
M SD M SD
Age
18-20 1.05 0.06 2.41 0.80
21-29 1.02 0.03 2.18 0.73
30-29 0.96 0.02 2.01 0.74
40-49 0.85 0.03 1.90 0.66
50-59 0.69 0.03 1.84 0.67
60 or more 0.58 0.03 1.68 0.71
Sex
Men 0.77 0.58 1.80 0.66
Women 1.00 0.71 2.10 0.73
Income
Low 0.98 0.71 2.06 0.69
Middle 0.75 0.59 1.90 0.69
High 0.74 0.59 1.87 0.66

Note. In Period 1, post hoc comparisons using the Tukey HSD test indicated that the mean score for the 18-20 and 21-29 years old subgroups had significantly more symptoms than the 40-49, 50-59, and 60 plus years old subgroups. Also, the 40-49 years old subgroups had a higher GSI than the 50-59 and 60 plus years old subgroups. In Period 2, the 18-20 years old subgroup had significantly more symptoms than 21-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59 and 60 plus years old subgroups. The 21-29 subgroup had significantly more symptoms than 30-39, 40-49, 50-59 and 60 plus years old subgroups. Also, the 30-39 years old subgroup had a higher GSI than the 50-59 and 60 plus years old subgroups. The 40-49 years old subgroup had more symptoms than the 60 plus subgroup.

In Period 1, post hoc comparisons using the Tukey HSD test indicated that the mean score for the low-income participants had a significant difference with the middle and high-income participants. In Period 2, the low-income participants reported the highest GSI score. Low-income participants had a significant difference with the middle and high-income participants.