Table 1.2. Estimates of Possible PGD Using Different Diagnostic Rules Across Five Countries.
| Scale | Swiss (n = 214) |
China (n = 325) |
Israela (n = 544) |
Portugueseb (n = 218) |
Irish (n = 830) |
||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | 95% CI |
% | 95% CI |
% | 95% CI |
% | 95% CI |
% | 95% CI |
||||||
| LL | UL | LL | UL | LL | UL | LL | UL | LL | UL | ||||||
| IPGDS | |||||||||||||||
| Strict criteria | 7.0 | 4.0 | 11.3 | 12.6 | 9.2 | 16.7 | – | – | – | 6.9 | 3.9 | 11.1 | – | – | – |
| Moderate criteria | 21.5 | 16.2 | 27.6 | 37.5 | 32.3 | 43.1 | – | – | – | 27.5 | 21.7 | 34.0 | – | – | – |
| Maciejewski criteria | 15.9 | 11.3 | 21.5 | 33.5 | 28.4 | 39.0 | – | – | – | 23.4 | 17.9 | 29.6 | – | – | – |
| ICG-R | (n = 118) Estimate only | ||||||||||||||
| Strict criteria | 5.1 | 2.6 | 9.0 | 7.1 | 4.5 | 10.4 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 3.6 | 21.1 | 14.2 | 29.7 | 4.1 | 2.9 | 5.7 |
| Moderate criteria | 18.2 | 13.3 | 24.1 | 29.2 | 24.3 | 34.5 | 8.5 | 6.3 | 11.1 | 48.3 | 39.0 | 57.7 | 13.9 | 11.6 | 16.4 |
| Maciejewski criteria | 6.1 | 3.3 | 10.2 | 10.5 | 7.4 | 14.3 | 4.2 | 2.7 | 6.3 | 7.6 | 3.5 | 14.0 | 4.7 | 3.4 | 6.4 |
aIn Israel dataset for ICG-R – no time criteria applied.
bIn Portuguese dataset for ICG-R – no time criteria applied, no functional criteria (Item 8) applied; for IPGDS - no time criteria applied, pooled across the general and clinical groups.