Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 7;29(12):2050–2056. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac178

Table 1.

Performance indicators and metrics applied in evaluation of DEN systems

Performance indicator Metric WA notify estimates as of March 2022a
Reach
 Number of installations within the population Count of active and cumulative users measured by user installations >3M activations, representing ∼51% of the adult WA population
Engagement
 Utilization among infected users
  1. Count of codes issued, claimed, keys published

  2. Attrition in user interface process

  • 902 824 verification codes issued

  • 76 936 diagnosis report started (codes claimed)

  • 71 499 diagnosis report completed (keys published)

  • 7.1% attrition of users who start diagnosis reporting process and do not finish

 Utilization among exposed users Count of ENs received, opened or dismissed
  • ENs opened (Web counter hits) = 742 336

 Ratio of utilization among infected and exposed users Ratio of exposures per diagnosis, measured as count of ENs opened per key published 7.9 ENs opened per diagnosis reported
Effectivenessa
 Transmissions prevented Model of cases averted 5500 infections prevented during the first 4 months
 Transmission characteristics Secondary attack rate (ie, the estimated proportion of individuals who develop COVID-19 among those who received an exposure notification) Range of SAR used in cases averted modeling include 5.1%–13.7% during the first 4 months of WA Notify
 Timeliness Time from exposure-to-EN 5.3 days
 Transmission characteristics Adherence to quarantine reported in UX surveys 53% of WA Notify user survey respondents reported staying home after receiving an EN
a

The effectiveness estimates are based on the November 2020–March 2021 cases averted analysis.