Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 23;3(4):e4581. doi: 10.32872/cpe.4581

Table 3. Goodness of Fit Indices for Each Priori-Model From Prior Research on the Clinical Perfectionism Questionnaire (n = 223).

Model χ2 df TLI CFI RMSEA 95% CI
Two-factor structure
Dickie et al. (2012) 101* 34 .59 .69 .09 .07, .12
Factor 1: 1, 3, 6, 9, 10, 11
Factor 2: 2, 4, 5, 12
Stoeber and Damian (2014) a 116* 49 .72 .79 .08 .06, .10
Factor 1: 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
Factor 2: 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12
Stoeber and Damian (2014)a, without reversed items 76* 31 .73 .81 .08 .06, .11
Factor 1: 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11
Factor 2: 4, 5, 7, 9, 12
Egan et al. (2016) b NAc NA NA NA NA NA
Factor 1: 1, 3, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
Factor 2: 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 12
Moloodi et al. (2017) d 114* 43 .66 .74 .09 .07, .11
Factor 1: 1, 3, 6, 7, 9, 10, 11
Factor 2: 2, 4, 5, 12
Single factor structure
Single factor 142* 54 .67 .73 .09 .07, .10
Single factor without reversed items 91* 35 .70 .77 .09 .06, .11

Note. Likelihood-ratio χ2-test (p > .05), the Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI; > .95), the Comparative Fit Index (CFI; > .95), the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA; < .06), cutoffs for indices presented in parentheses. df = Degrees of Freedom; CI = Confidence Interval.

aBased on the results reported for the first Exploratory Factor Analysis.

bBased on the results reported for Study 1.

cModel did not converge.

dBased on the results reported for the general population.

*p < .05.