Table 5.

Regression coefficients and stepwise changes (1–3) in determination of three dependent variables between parallel models including either GRIT-S (A) or MTQ-10 (B) as predictor along with beneficial and harmful sisu in office worker data (n = 82).

Dependent variable	Step	Added predictors	Beta	t		R2	Adj. R2	ΔR2
WHO-5	1	Sex, age				0.05	0.03	0.05
Well-being	2A	GRIT-S	0.41	4.02	∗∗∗	0.21	0.18	0.16	∗∗∗
	3A1	GRIT-S	0.21	1.92	†	0.39	0.35	0.18	∗∗∗
		Beneficial sisu	0.42	4.52	∗∗∗
		Harmful sisu	-0.20	-1.89	†
	2B	MTQ-10	0.64	7.23	∗∗∗	0.43	0.41	0.38	∗∗∗
	3B	MTQ-10	0.46	3.78	∗∗∗	0.46	0.43	0.03
		Beneficial sisu	0.20	1.82	†
		Harmful sisu	-0.14	-1.52
CES-D	1	Sex, age				0.04	0.02	0.04
Depression	2A	GRIT-S	-0.44	-4.33	∗∗∗	0.23	0.20	0.19	∗∗∗
	3A2	GRIT-S	-0.13	-1.28		0.46	0.42	0.23	∗∗∗
		Beneficial sisu	-0.34	-3.87	∗∗∗
		Harmful sisu	0.45	4.59	∗∗∗
	2B	MTQ-10	-0.57	-5.95	∗∗∗	0.34	0.31	0.30	∗∗∗
	3B	MTQ-10	-0.29	-2.41	∗	0.48	0.45	0.14	∗∗∗
		Beneficial sisu	-0.21	-1.88	†
		Harmful sisu	0.42	4.54	∗∗∗
Effort-reward imbalance (ERI)	12	Sex, age				0.11	0.09	0.11	∗
	2A2	GRIT-S	0.02	0.19		0.11	0.07	0.00
Work stress	3B2	GRIT-S	0.26	2.28	∗	0.33	0.28	0.22	∗∗∗
		Beneficial sisu	0.07	0.67
		Harmful sisu	0.52	4.78	∗∗∗
	2B2	MTQ-10	-0.08	-0.71		0.11	0.08	0.01
	3B2	MTQ-10	-0.03	-0.24		0.28	0.23	0.17	∗∗∗
		Beneficial sisu	0.15	1.15
		Harmful sisu	0.39	3.57	∗∗∗

∗∗∗ = p < .001, ∗ = p < 0.05. † = p < 0.10

¹Sex(male) significant (p < 0.05) positive predictor in the model

²Sex(male) significant (p < 0.05) negative predictor in the model, Adj. R² = Adjusted R^2, ΔR^2, = R² change from previous model.