Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 1;10(11):e36711. doi: 10.2196/36711

Table 3.

Global performances of the Damerau-Levenshtein distance (DLD)–based algorithm versus that of the direct-matching algorithm.

Matching algorithm Sample size, N Sensitivity, % (95% CI) Specificity, % (95% CI)
Distance-baseda 21860 93.3 (92.8-93.9) 99 (98.7-99.2)
Direct 21860 82.7 (81.8–83.6) 99.9 (99.8-100)
P value McNemar test N/Ab <.001 <.001

aMaximal total distance: 2.

bN/A: not applicable.