Demitur.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | A prospective, randomised, controlled, clinical trial Intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol analyses |
|
Participants | 151 participants overall enrolled in the study. Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
|
|
Interventions | Surgical decompression involved a large fronto‐temporo‐parietal ipsilateral hemicraniectomy. Medical therapy for the control group involved intravenous mannitol (0.25 to 0.5 g/kg) or furosemide was given only in participants whose condition was rapidly worsening because of brain oedema, elevation of the head and maintenance of normothermia, normoglycaemia, and normovolaemia. Use of muscle relaxants was left to the discretion of the treating physician and propofol administered as needed. Intravenous antihypertensive agents were recommended when systolic blood pressure was > 220 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure was > 120 mmHg. Prophylaxis of deep venous thrombosis was performed by weight‐adjusted low‐molecular‐weight heparin. If there was no haemorrhagic transformation, antiplatelet or anticoagulant treatment was started 1 week after stroke. |
|
Outcomes | The primary endpoint was survival without severe disability (mRS 0 to 3) at 6 and 12 months. Secondary outcome measures were death, Barthel Index, NIHSS, and quality of life assessed by SIS 2.0 at 6 months and 1 year after randomisation. |
|
Notes | This study was conducted from 2003 to 2008. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "1:1 allocation assignment using a random number table" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Independent randomisation with codes in sealed envelopes |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | No blinding |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Blinding of neurologist assessing primary outcome by placing a surgical cap on the patient |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No missing data |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Study protocol not available Registered on clinical trials registry after study was completed |
Other bias | High risk | Study withdrawn soon after publication at the request of the authors. We contacted the authors and the reason given was "conflict between the authors" |