Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 16;21:337. doi: 10.1186/s12936-022-04351-y

Table 1.

Comparison among malaria testing methods

Enrollment
(n = 240)
Follow-up
(n = 120)
All samples
(n = 360)
qPCR positive, n (%) 156 (65.0%) 64 (53.3%) 220 (61.1%)
qPCR density median [IQR] (calculated pRBCs/μL) 19.5 [1.5, 281.1] 13.3 [1.6, 164.4] 17.1 [1.5, 248.9]
Microscopy positive, n (%) 92 (38.3%) 24 (20.0%) 116 (32.2%)
us-RDT positive, n (%) 108 (45%) 45 (37.5%) 153 (42.5%)
Micro sensitivity (%) [95%CI] 53.8 [50.3, 57.3] 35.9 [26.4, 45.4] 48.6 [46.9, 50.3]
us-RDT sensitivity (%) [95%CI] 60.3 [54.6, 66.0] 50.0 [ 50.0, 50.0] 57.3 [53.4, 61.2]
Micro specificity (%) [95%CI] 90.5 [79.1, 100] 98.2 [80.6, 100] 93.6 [84.0, 100]
us-RDT specificity (%) [95%CI] 83.3 [73.0, 93.6] 76.8 [63.7, 89.9] 80.7 [72.6, 88.8]
Micro PPV (%) [95%CI] 91.3 [79.8, 100] 95.8 [78.7, 100] 92.2 [82.7, 100]
us-RDT PPV (%) [95%CI] 87.0 [76.1, 97.9] 71.1 [ 59.6, 82.7] 82.4 [74.1, 90.1]
Micro NPV (%) [95%CI] 51.4 [49.3, 53.5] 57.3 [ 50.4, 64.1] 53.7 [50.9, 56.5]
us-RDT NPV (%)[ 95%CI] 53.0 [49.9, 56.1] 57.3 [50.4, 64.1] 54.6 [51.5, 57.7]