Table 2.
Histologic subtyping of available patient samples and PDX models
| Patient ID | Histology | Epithelioid subtyping | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (E/B/S) | Predominant architecture | All patterns present | Nuclear grade (Kadota/MSKCC) | ||||||
| Patient | PDX | Patient | PDX | Patient | PDX | Patient | PDX | ||
| Epithelioid | MSK_LX282 | E | E | Trabecular | Trabecular | T | T, S | I | I |
| MSK_LX627 | E | E | Trabecular | Trabecular | T | S | II | II | |
| MSK_LX703A | E | NA | Tubulopapillary | NA | S, MP, TP | NA | II | NA | |
| MSK_LX13 | E | NA | Solid | NA | S, P* | NA | II | NA | |
| MSK_LX606 | E | E | Solid | Solid | S, TP | S, T | II | II | |
| MSK_LX333 | E | E | Tubulopapillary | Solid | TP, MP, S | S | III | III | |
| MSK_LX590 | E | E | Solid | Solid | S, TP | S, TP | III | III | |
| MSK_LX678 | E | E | Solid | Solid | S | S | III | III | |
| MSK_LX154 | E | E | Solid | Solid | S | S | I | II | |
| MSK_LX413 | E | E | Trabecular | Solid | T, S, TP | S, T | II | III | |
| MSK_LX570 | E | E | Solid | Solid | S, T | S | II | III | |
| MSK_LX944B | E | E | Tubulopapillary | Solid | TP, T, S | S | II | II | |
| MSK_LX892 | E | NA | Tubulopapillary | NA | TP | NA | I | NA | |
| MSK_LX19 | E | NA | Solid | NA | S | NA | III | NA | |
| MSK_LX96 | E | E | Trabecular | Solid | T, S, TP | S | III | II | |
Comparative histologic subtyping for the patient (n = 22) and PDX TMA samples (n = 16) with available tissue. For the 15 patient samples with epithelioid histology, the predominant architecture, all architectural patterns/cytologic features present, and nuclear grades were annotated and compared to the 11 available PDX specimens
E epithelioid, B biphasic, S sarcomatoid, PDX patient derived xenograft, MSKCC Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Trabecular [T]; Tubulopapillary [TP]; Solid [S]; Micropapillary [MP]; Pleomorphic [P]; not applicable [NA]