Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 15;14:127. doi: 10.1186/s13073-022-01129-4

Table 2.

Histologic subtyping of available patient samples and PDX models

Patient ID Histology Epithelioid subtyping
(E/B/S) Predominant architecture All patterns present Nuclear grade (Kadota/MSKCC)
Patient PDX Patient PDX Patient PDX Patient PDX
Epithelioid MSK_LX282 E E Trabecular Trabecular T T, S I I
MSK_LX627 E E Trabecular Trabecular T S II II
MSK_LX703A E NA Tubulopapillary NA S, MP, TP NA II NA
MSK_LX13 E NA Solid NA S, P* NA II NA
MSK_LX606 E E Solid Solid S, TP S, T II II
MSK_LX333 E E Tubulopapillary Solid TP, MP, S S III III
MSK_LX590 E E Solid Solid S, TP S, TP III III
MSK_LX678 E E Solid Solid S S III III
MSK_LX154 E E Solid Solid S S I II
MSK_LX413 E E Trabecular Solid T, S, TP S, T II III
MSK_LX570 E E Solid Solid S, T S II III
MSK_LX944B E E Tubulopapillary Solid TP, T, S S II II
MSK_LX892 E NA Tubulopapillary NA TP NA I NA
MSK_LX19 E NA Solid NA S NA III NA
MSK_LX96 E E Trabecular Solid T, S, TP S III II

Comparative histologic subtyping for the patient (n = 22) and PDX TMA samples (n = 16) with available tissue. For the 15 patient samples with epithelioid histology, the predominant architecture, all architectural patterns/cytologic features present, and nuclear grades were annotated and compared to the 11 available PDX specimens

E epithelioid, B biphasic, S sarcomatoid, PDX patient derived xenograft, MSKCC Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Trabecular [T]; Tubulopapillary [TP]; Solid [S]; Micropapillary [MP]; Pleomorphic [P]; not applicable [NA]