Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 1;16(6):892–898. doi: 10.5009/gnl210399

Table 3.

Comparison of Clinicopathological Characteristics of Patients in Anterograde Resection and Retrograde Resection Groups

Variable Anterograde resection (n=47) Retrograde resection (n=50) p-value
Age, yr 62.7±9.1 63.5±10.2 0.694
Male sex 27 (57.4) 32 (64.0) 0.509
Location 0.001
Confined to channel, antrum or bulb 44 (93.6) 33 (66.0)
Antrum–bulb 3 (6.4) 17 (34.0)
Helicobacter pylori infection 20 (42.6) 20 (40.0) 0.798
Histopathology 0.471
Low grade dysplasia 20 (42.6) 22 (44.0)
High grade dysplasia 7 (14.9) 9 (18.0)
Early gastric cancer 19 (40.4) 15 (30.0)
Miscellaneous 1 (2.1) 4 (8.0)
Tumor size, mm 11.7±7.2 17.4±10.0 0.002
Circumference of resection <0.001
<25% 15 (31.9) 1 (2.0)
25% to <75% 18 (38.3) 21 (42.0)
≥75% 14 (29.8) 28 (56.0)
Procedure time, min 30.8±17.0 45.1±19.4 <0.001
Immediate complication
Perforation 1 (2.1) 1 (2.0) 0.965
Major bleeding 1 (2.1) 1 (2.0) 0.976
Loss of hemoglobin, g/dL 0.6±0.7 0.5±0.7 0.905
En bloc resection 41 (87.2) 44 (88.0) 0.909
Complete resection 39 (82.9) 42 (84.0) 0.892
Postprocedural stenosis 5 (10.6) 11 (22.0) 0.132
Recurrence rate 1 (2.1) 0 0.300
Additional surgery 1 (2.1) 2 (4.0) 0.228

Data are presented as mean±SD or number (%).