Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 16;36:103203. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103203

Table 5.

Dynamic functional connectivity results for comparison between healthy participants and patients with EDSS ≤ 1.

State Regionsa Networks Components puncorr. pFDR T d
1 Superior parietal lobule (right) – Superior parietal lobule (left) dATT – dATT 80 – 75 < 0.001 0.089 3.527 0.930
BG – Superior parietal lobule (right) BG – dATT 3 – 80 < 0.001 0.171 −3.376 −0.729
ANG (right) – LOcc (left) DMN – dATT 31 – 95 < 0.001 0.050* −3.741 −0.941
BG – Precentral gyrus BG – SMN 3 – 37 < 0.001 0.075 −3.929 −0.649
Precuneus cortex – Precuneus cortex DMN – DMN 84 – 40 < 0.001 0.089 3.593 0.645
2 ANG (right) – Frontal pole DMN – DMN 53 – 50 < 0.001 0.303 3.451 0.764
3 CB – BG CB – BG 20 – 3 < 0.001 0.501 3.456 0.709

Table includes state labels, brain regions, and network labels for the corresponding components, uncorrected p-values (puncorr.), FDR-corrected p-values (pFDR), T-values and Cohen’s effect size (d). EDSS: Expanded disability status scale; FDR: false discovery rate; BG: basal ganglia; ANG: angular gyrus; LOcc: Lateral occipital cortex, superior division; ANG: angular gyrus; CB: cerebellum; dATT: dorsal attention network; DMN: default mode network; SMN: somatomotor network.

a

Component region labels are bilateral unless otherwise noted.