Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 16;36:103203. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103203

Table 7.

Dynamic functional connectivity results for comparisons between patients with EDSS ≤ 1 and patients with EDSS ≥ 2.

State Regionsa Networks Components puncorr. pFDR T d
1
SMG – SMG FPN – dATT 23 – 49 < 0.001 0.357 −3.332 −0.730
Postcentral gyrus – Precentral gyrus SMN – SMN 89 – 37 < 0.001 0.357 −3.481 −0.913
LOcc – SMA FPN – SMN 69 – 68 < 0.001 0.357 −3.229 −0.639
2 LOcc – TOFC VIS – VIS 96 – 88 < 0.001 0.270 3.626 0.747
3 Lingual gyrus – Precentral gyrus VIS – SMN 81 – 37 < 0.001 0.371 3.547 0.755
4 LOcc – TOFC VIS – VIS 96 – 88 < 0.001 <0.001* 4.485 0.911
5 MFG (left) – Planum Temporale FPN – SMN 52 – 15 < 0.001 0.368 −3.500 −0.787
MFG (left) – Precentral gyrus FPN – SMN 52 – 37 < 0.001 0.368 −3.353 −0.950

Table includes state labels, brain regions, and network labels for the corresponding components, uncorrected p-values (puncorr.), FDR-corrected p-values (pFDR), T-values and Cohen’s effect size (d). EDSS: Expanded disability status scale; FDR: false discovery rate; SMG: supramarginal gyrus; LOcc: Lateral occipital cortex, superior division; SMA: supplementary motor area; TOCF: temporal occipital fusiform cortex; MFG: middle frontal gyrus; FPN: fronto-parietal control network; dATT: dorsal attention network; SMN: somatomotor network; VIS: visual network.

a

Component region labels are bilateral unless otherwise noted.