Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 3;9:1024836. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1024836

TABLE 2.

Comparison of FIB-4 and NFS for diagnostic performance of advanced hepatic fibrosis in various groups.

Advanced fibrosis*
n (%)
Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%)
 FIB-4 to use low cut-off; 1.3 (2.0)
Total subjects 102 (2.6) 69.6 77.5 4.9 99.3
Non-fatty liver group 39 (1.2) 71.8 76.7 3.6 99.6
Metabolically healthy group 25 (0.8) 64.0 78.2 2.2 99.6
Fatty liver group 63 (2.1) 68.3 78.4 6.4 99.1
Metabolically unhealthy group 77 (2.6) 71.4 76.7 7.7 99.0
 NFS to use low cut-off; –1.455 (0.12)
Total subjects 102 (2.6) 61.4 81.1 5.2 99.2
Non-fatty liver group 39 (1.2) 59.0 82.6 4.0 99.4
Metabolically healthy group 25 (0.8) 44.0 89.0 3.0 99.5
Fatty liver group 63 (2.1) 62.9 79.5 6.2 99.0
Metabolically unhealthy group 77 (2.6) 67.1 72.1 6.1 98.8

*Prevalence of subjects with advanced hepatic fibrosis among total subjects (n = 6,215), and the non-fatty liver (n = 3,252), metabolically healthy (n = 3,291), fatty liver (n = 2,963), and metabolically unhealthy (n = 2,924) groups. FIB-4, fibrosis-4 index; MRE, magnetic resonance elastography; NFS, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.