Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 3;13:983160. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.983160

Table 3.

Hazard ratios (HRs) for the association of TyG index or CRP levels with CRC risk.

Group Cases/person-years Crude models Adjusted models
HR (95%CI) p-value HR (95%CI) p-value
TyG index (continuous) 586/1145910 1.32 (1.17,1.47) <0.001 1.21 (1.06,1.37) 0.006
TyG index (median)
 < 8.59 228/572835 Ref. Ref.
 ≥ 8.59 358/573075 1.57 (1.33,1.84) <0.001 1.41 (1.17,1.67) <0.001
P for interactiona 0.048
CRP (continuous) 586/1145910 1.01 (1.00,1.02) 0.128 1.00 (0.99,1.01) 0.758
CRP
 < 1 mg/L 291/672247 Ref. Ref.
 1-3 mg/L 162/277672 1.36 (1.12,1.65) 0.002 1.17 (0.97,1.43) 0.109
>3 mg/L 133/195992 1.59 (1.29,1.95) <0.001 1.29 (1.05,1.60) 0.017
P for trend <0.001 0.042

Adjusted models were adjusted for age (every 10 years), sex, family income, educational background, WC, TC, smoking status, drinking status, physical activity, sedentary lifestyle, tea consumption, high-fat diet, hypertension, diabetes, and family history of cancer.

aInteraction between TyG index and CRP for the risk of CRC.