TABLE 3.
Comparison of the technical and economic indices between ionic liquids and the Hall–Héroult method.
Method parameter | Electrolytic aluminum | |
---|---|---|
Ionic liquids | Hall-héroult | |
Tank Voltage (V) | 2.0–4.0 | 4.2–5.0 |
Energy Consumption (kW·h/t-Al) | 9,500–11,000 | 13,000–19,000 |
Current Density (mA/cm2) | 20–100 | N/A |
Electrode Distance (mm) | 5–40 | 100 |
Temperature (°C) | 25–150 | 800–1,000 |
CO Emission (kg/t-Al) | 0 | 340 |
CO2 Emission (kg/t-Al) | 0 | 1,000–1,500 |
CF4 Emission (kg/t-Al) | 0 | 1.5–2.5 |
HF Emission (kg/t-Al) | 0 | 20–40 |
Energy Efficiency (%) | >90 | <50 |