Gaining comprehensive understanding of the issue |
Perspectives on EBN Strategies
|
“The mixed-methods design enabled us to get as complete a
picture as possible.” (Strandberg et al., 2016: 7) |
Development and Assessment of EBN Strategies
|
“The design was a concurrent mixed-methods design used to
engender multiple perspectives about a complex phenomenon.” (Stoddart et al.,
2012: 51) |
Implementation or Evaluation of EBN Strategies
|
“Mixed-methods was the chosen design…to provide complementary
insights…and to allow for data triangulation.” (Sawan et al., 2021: 716) |
Used Qual to gain deeper understanding |
Perspectives on EBN Strategies
|
“The qualitative findings were used to better understand and
explain the quantitative results.” (Strandberg et al., 2014: 57) |
Development and Assessment of EBN Strategies
|
“Focus groups allowed in depth exploration of experiences and
promoted sharing and discussion of ideas.” (Griffiths et al., 2015: 466) |
Implementation or Evaluation of EBN Strategies
|
“We utilized a mixed-methods design… to apply another lens for
an in-depth investigation of facilitation.” (Dogherty et al., 2012:4) |
Strengthen validity |
Perspectives on EBN Strategies
|
“Reliability is facilitated by applied, structured,
quantitative methods to qualitative data.” (Blackstone et al., 2017: 352) |
Development and Assessment of EBN Strategies
|
“To ensure that our recommendations were applicable to current
clinical practice, we… gathered robust data using several methods.” (Conway et
al., 2014: 1050) |
Implementation or Evaluation of EBN Strategies
|
“Triangulation of parent survey findings with… qualitative
interviews increases the internal and external validity of the findings.”
(Aventin et al., 2020: 14) |
Unique rationale |
Implementation or Evaluation of EBN Strategies
|
“Qualitative approaches can be used for several purposes
before, during, and after a trial. Following the trial, collection and
analysis of qualitative data can (a) assist investigators in exploring reasons
why an intervention succeeded or failed; (b) explain variations in the
effectiveness of the intervention; (c) examine the suitability of the theory
used to guide the trial; and (d) generate additional questions and
hypotheses.” (Ersek and
Jablonski, 2014: 3) |