Table 5. End Point FAME Concentration Comparison Study.

end point FAME concentration (kmol/m3)
	case study 1			case study 2
batch number	heuristic-based approach	batch-to-batch ILC	proposed approach	heuristic-based approach	batch-to-batch ILC	proposed approach
batch 1	0.8492	0.8492	0.8492	0.8346	0.8346	0.8346
batch 2	0.8526	0.8574	0.8573	0.8378	0.8471	0.8422
batch 3	0.8539	0.8649	0.8686	0.8408	0.8592	0.8540
batch 4	0.859	0.8720	0.8812	0.8438	0.8595	0.8647
batch 5	0.862	0.8785		0.8466	0.8614	0.8748
batch 6	0.865	0.8847		0.8494	0.8658	0.8802
batch 7	0.8678			0.8521	0.8715
batch 8	0.8706			0.8547	0.8715
batch 9	0.8733			0.8573	0.8814
batch 10	0.8759			0.8598
batch 11	0.8785			0.8622
batch 12	0.881			0.8646
batch 13				0.8646
batch 14				0.8691
batch 15				0.8713
batch 16				0.8734
batch 17				0.8755
batch 18				0.8775
batch 19				0.8794
batch 20				0.8813