Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 17;2022(11):CD014963. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014963.pub2

Risk of bias for analysis 8.1 All‐cause mortality up to 30 days.

Study Bias
Randomisation process Deviations from intended interventions Missing outcome data Measurement of the outcome Selection of the reported results Overall
Authors' judgement Support for judgement Authors' judgement Support for judgement Authors' judgement Support for judgement Authors' judgement Support for judgement Authors' judgement Support for judgement Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Ranjbar 2021 Low risk of bias Random allocation using the block randomisation method was performed in all four branches of the strata, based on two prognostic factors such as age (< 55 and ≥55) and disease severity based on O2 saturation (<85 and ≥85). The patient, assessor, and analyser in the two groups did not have access to the randomisation list and type of administered drug (Triple blind). No major differences in the baseline characteristics. Low risk of bias The patient, assessor, and analyser in the two groups did not have access to the randomisation list and type of administered drug (Triple blind). ITT analysis was used. Low risk of bias No missing data. Low risk of bias The measurements were similar between groups Some concerns Protocol and SAP are not available. Some concerns Overall judged some concerns due to selective reporting.