. 2022 Nov 16;22:439. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02665-8

Table 2.

Retinal reattachment rate and comparison of final BCVA and pre-reoperative BCVA

Anatomical outcome(n,%)	Final BCVA (x ± SD) LogMAR/Decimal	Preoperative BCVA (x ± SD) LogMAR/Decimal	P value^*
All patients (n = 20,100%)	0.8 ± 0.7LogMAR (0.15 ± 0.2)	1.2 ± 0.6 LogMAR (0.06 ± 0.25)	0.008
Macular attached (n = 19,95%)	0.7 ± 0.4 LogMAR (0.2 ± 0.4)	1.1 ± 0.6 LogMAR (0.08 ± 0.25)	0.001
Incomplete retinal attachment (n = 18,90%)	0.6 ± 0.4 LogMAR (0.25 ± 0.4)	1.1 ± 0.6 LogMAR (0.08 ± 0.25)	0.001
Complete retinal attachment (n = 16,80%)	0.6 ± 0.4 LogMAR (0.25 ± 0.4)	1.0 ± 0.5 LogMAR (0.1 ± 0.3)	0.004
Single-operation complete retinal attachment (n = 15,75%)	0.5 ± 0.4 LogMAR (0.3 ± 0.4)	1.0 ± 0.5 LogMAR (0.1 ± 0.3)	0.003

Anatomical outcome(n,%)

Final BCVA (x ± SD)
LogMAR/Decimal

Preoperative BCVA (x ± SD)
LogMAR/Decimal

P value^*

All patients

(n = 20,100%)

0.8 ± 0.7LogMAR

(0.15 ± 0.2)

1.2 ± 0.6 LogMAR

(0.06 ± 0.25)

0.008

Macular attached

(n = 19,95%)

0.7 ± 0.4 LogMAR

(0.2 ± 0.4)

1.1 ± 0.6 LogMAR

(0.08 ± 0.25)

0.001

Incomplete retinal attachment

(n = 18,90%)

0.6 ± 0.4 LogMAR

(0.25 ± 0.4)

1.1 ± 0.6 LogMAR

(0.08 ± 0.25)

0.001

Complete retinal attachment

(n = 16,80%)

0.6 ± 0.4 LogMAR

(0.25 ± 0.4)

1.0 ± 0.5 LogMAR

(0.1 ± 0.3)

0.004

Single-operation complete retinal attachment

(n = 15,75%)

0.5 ± 0.4 LogMAR

(0.3 ± 0.4)

1.0 ± 0.5 LogMAR

(0.1 ± 0.3)

0.003

^*statistical analysis by paired-t test