Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 14;10:e14381. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14381

Table 3. Modified downs and black scale for reviewed intervention studies.

Reference (year) Item
1
Item
2
Item
3
Item
6
Item
7
Item
10
Item
12
Item
15
Item
16
Item
18
Item
20
Item
22
Item
23
Item
25
Total score
(out of 14)
Folgado et al. (2015) 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 9
Folgado, Gonçalves & Sampaio (2018) 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 10
Gonçalves et al. (2014) 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 8
Gonçalves et al. (2018a) 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 11
Olthof, Frencken & Lemmink (2018) 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 10
Praça et al. (2016) 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 9
Praça et al. (2021) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 11
Sampaio et al. (2014) 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 8

Note:

0 = no; 1 = yes; U = unable to determine. Item 1: clear aim/hypothesis; Item 2: outcome measures clearly described; Item 3: patient characteristics clearly described; Item 6: main findings clearly described; Item 7: measures of random variability provided; Item 10: actual probability values reported; Item 12: participants prepared to participate representative of entire population; Item 15: blinding of outcome measures; Item 16: analysis completed was planned; Item 18: appropriate statistics; Item 20: valid and reliable outcome measures; Item 22: participants recruited over same period; Item 23: randomised; Item 25: adjustment made for confounding variables.