Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 17;2022(11):CD013652. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013652.pub2

Flower 2020 [E].

Study characteristics
Patient Sampling  
Patient characteristics and setting  
Index tests Test name: Phase I:
(A) Wondfo SARS‐CoV‐2 Antibody test (lateral flow method);
(B) Menarini Zheijang Orient Gene (lateral flow);
(C) Fortress Diagnostics COVID‐19 TOTAL Ab Device;
(D) Biopanda COVID‐19 Rapid Antibody test;
(E) Biosure COVID‐1 Antibody Self‐Test.
Manufacturer:
(A) Guangzhou Wondfo Biotech (Guangzhou, China);
(B) Menarini Zhejiang Orient Gene Biotech Co Ltd;
(C) Fortress Diagnostics;
(D) Biopanda;
(E) Biosure (Mologic).
Antibody:
(A) IgG/M combined;
(B) IgG & M;
(C) IgG & M;
(D) IgG & M;
(E) IgG only.
Antigen target:
(A) S;
(B) S1, S2 and N;
(C) S;
D) S and N;
(E) N.
Evaluation setting: POCT performed as POCT and in lab for comparison
Test method: Lateral flow immunoassay
Timing of samples: After 21 days of symptom onset; median (q1, q3) duration = 44 (35‐53) days; range 21–100 days
Samples used: LFIA self‐tests with finger‐prick capillary blood; provided on the same day venous whole blood and serum samples for laboratory analysis
Test operator: Self‐test (participant interpretation) and observed by a member of the team (trained interpreter observation), finger prick participant self‐read and finger prick trained observer‐read
Lab test on serum and whole blood samples: Initially, scoring was performed independently by two technicians, but this practice ceased after inter‐rater scoring was found to be almost perfect by 7‐point categorical score (Kappa = 0.81)
Definition of test positivity: By the presence of IgG band (if two separate lines are there for IgG and IgM separately, n=3 kits OR if only one line to detect IgG only, n=1 kit) or presence of combined IgG + IgM band (n=1 kit). Manufacturer instructions were followed. Intensity of the result band(s) from 0 (negative) to 6 according to a standardised scoring system on a visual guide. Invalid tests were repeated. A photograph of the completed test was emailed to the study team.
For consistency, in the three kits which had separate IgM and IgG bands ([B], [C], [D]), only IgG was counted as a positive result (i.e. ‘MG’ or ‘G’ but not ‘M’, distinct from manufacturer guidance).
[E] Commercial Biosure kit comes in box with device holder and reading card. Clinic self‐tests in this study were performed
with the device alone.
Blinding reported: Yes for lab analyses, no for self‐test
Threshold predefined: Yes
Target condition and reference standard(s) See main entry for this study for characteristics and QUADAS‐2 assessment
Flow and timing See main entry for this study for characteristics and QUADAS‐2 assessment
Comparative  
Notes  
Methodological quality
Item Authors' judgement Risk of bias Applicability concerns
DOMAIN 1: Patient Selection
Was a consecutive or random sample of patients enrolled? Unclear    
Was a case‐control design avoided? No    
Did the study avoid inappropriate exclusions? Unclear    
Did the study avoid inappropriate inclusions? Unclear    
Could the selection of patients have introduced bias?   High risk  
Are there concerns that the included patients and setting do not match the review question?     High
DOMAIN 2: Index Test (All tests)
DOMAIN 2: Index Test (Antibody tests)
DOMAIN 3: Reference Standard
Is the reference standards likely to correctly classify the target condition? Yes    
Were the reference standard results interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index tests? Yes    
The reference standard does not incorporate the index test Yes    
Could the reference standard, its conduct, or its interpretation have introduced bias?   Low risk  
Are there concerns that the target condition as defined by the reference standard does not match the question?     High
DOMAIN 4: Flow and Timing
Was there an appropriate interval between index test and reference standard? Unclear    
Did all patients receive the same reference standard? No    
Were all patients included in the analysis? Yes    
Did all participants receive a reference standard? No    
Were results presented per patient? Unclear    
Could the patient flow have introduced bias?   High risk