Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Nov 17.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Mar 30;101(5):1046–1056. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.03.028

Table 1.

Clinical experience with established and emerging MRI techniques for radiation therapy response assessment

Imaging technique* Tissue properties
measured
In-plane resolution
(mm2)
Slice thickness
(mm)
All published
studies
Published studies in assessing
radiation treatment response
T1-W, T2-W MRI Tumor delineation 0.5-2 2-5 +++++ +++++
DW MRI Cellularity 2-3 4-6 ++++ ++++
DCE MRI Permeability, perfusion 2-3 4-6 ++++ ++++
MR spectroscopy Metabolite concentrations 6-20 10-25 ++ ++
BOLD MRI Oxygenation 2-4 3-6 +++ +
CEST MRI Protein concentrations 2-3 2-6 +++ +++
Hyperpolarized 13C MRI Pyruvate metabolism 7-15 10-20 + +

Abbreviations: BOLD = blood oxygenation level–dependent; CEST = chemical exchange saturation transfer; DCE = dynamic contrast-enhanced; DW = diffusion-weighted; T1 = T1-weighted; T2-W = T2-weighted.

+++++ = widespread clinical use. ++++ = published literature in a variety of tissue types; becoming widespread clinically. +++ = emerging technique with demonstrated clinical success in some tissues. ++ = older technique with limited success clinically. + = emerging technique with published experience limited to small animal imaging.

*

Parameters for standard T1-W MRI, T2-W MRI, DW MRI, DCE MRI, MR spectroscopy, BOLD MRI, and CEST MRI are summarized with input from an experienced clinical medical physicist (R. Jason Stafford, PhD). The listed spatial resolution and slice thickness for hyperpolarized MRI is as summarized in previous published clinical work in patients with prostate cancer (72).