Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 19;93(6):721–726. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003790

TABLE 2.

Comparison of Outcomes Between Patients Undergoing SSRF Versus Nonoperative Treatment, Stratified for Pulmonary Contusion Severity

Mild Contusion
n = 80
p Moderate Contusion
n = 92
p Severe Contusion
n = 44
p
SSRF Non-op SSRF Non-op SSRF Non-op
Pneumonia 4 (8%) 8 (29%) 0.020 7 (12%) 8 (24%) 0.147 8 (24%) 3 (30%) 0.692
Tracheostomy* 7 (14%) 6 (25%) 0.327 10 (18%) 7 (28%) 0.381 12 (39%) 4 (50%) 0.694
Mortality 0 (0%) 1 (4%) 0.350 0 (0%) 1 (3%) 1.000 0 (0%) 1 (3%) 1.000
ICU admission 48 (92%) 26 (93%) 1.000 56 (95%) 32 (97%) 1.000 34 (100%) 10 (100%) 1.000
ICU LOS 4 (2–6) 5 (3–15) 0.041 5 (2–11) 7 (3–16) 0.130 6 (4–15) 13 (6–20) 0.143
MV need 13 (25%) 12 (43%) 0.131 27 (46%) 21 (64%) 0.129 20 (59%) 6 (60%) 1.000
MV days 0 (0–2) 0 (0–13) 0.047 0 (0–6) 4 (0–19) 0.036 3 (0–12) 9 (0–24) 0.481
Hospital LOS 9 (5–15) 12 (6–18) 0.147 11 (7–19) 14 (8–24) 0.128 13 (8–26) 18 (12–39) 0.273

*Patients with head AIS score of >3 are excluded from this analysis with total n = 198.

Data are shown as median (P25–P75) or as n (%). Significant differences are printed in bold.

Mild contusion is BPC18 scores of 1 to 3, moderate contusion is BPC18 scores of 4 to 6, and severe contusion is BPC18 scores of 7 to 18.

LOS, length of stay; MV, mechanical ventilation; non-op, nonoperative management of rib fractures.