Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Oct 12.
Published in final edited form as: J Health Commun. 2022 Oct 12;27(7):520–534. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2022.2131942

Table 1:

School- and student-level demographic characteristics, (School Year 2020–21)

Tde Bigger Picture (TBP; Intervention) Traditional Youth Speaks (Comparison) P-Value B

School-level A n=3 schools n=3 schools

 Student enrollment, mean (SD) 643.7 (482.1) 570.3 (454.2) 0.857

 Student race/ethnicity, mean % (SD)
  Black/African American 11.3 (3.9) 16.4 (5.3) 0.256
  Asian 13.4 (16.2) 7.9 (7.5) 0.626
  Hispanic/Latinx 56.3 (16.4) 50.0 (12.5) 0.629
  White 3.6 (2.1) 11.1 (8.5) 0.213
  Other 15.5 (4.9) 14.6 (4.7) 0.836

 Student sex, mean % (SD)
  Female 44.0 (0.3) 42.5 (5.9) 0.675
  Male 56.0 (0.6) 57.5 (5.9) 0.675

 Student eligibility for free or reduced-price lunch,C mean % (SD)
64.1 (0.6)

61.6 (13.5)

0.765

Student-level D n=77 students n=63 students

 Grade, n (%)
  9th 22.1 ± 41.7 52.4 ± 50.3 <0.001
  10th 9.1 ± 28.9 30.2 ± 46.2 0.001
  11th 51.9 ± 50.3 7.9 ± 27.2 <0.001
  12th 16.9 ± 37.7 9.5 ± 29.6 0.209

 Student race/ethnicity, n (%)
  White 5.2 ± 22.3 14.3 ± 35.3 0.066
  Hispanic or Latino 54.5 ± 50.1 39.7 ± 49.3 0.081
  Asian 27.3 ± 44.8 22.2 ± 41.9 0.496
  African American 5.1 ± 22.3 7.9 ± 27.2 0.514
  Other/Multiple/Prefer not to state 7.8 ± 27.0 15.9 ± 36.8 0.137

 Student gender, n (%)
  Female 37.7 ± 48.8 46.0 ± 50.2 0.321
  Male 59.7 ± 49.4 46.0 ± 50.2 0.107
  OtherE 2.6 ± 16.01 6.3 ± 24.6 0.279
A

School-level data were obtained from the California Department of Education

B

P-value for difference between intervention and comparison calculated from unpaired t-tests

C

Used as a proxy for socio-economic status. Students qualified if their household’s income is less than or equal to the federal income guidelines

D

Student-level data were obtained from the student survey

E

Includes students who identify as non-binary, transgender, and compound gender, and those who preferred not to state