Table 10.

Dual_Pachi Quantitative Ablation studies illustrate the contribution of each part in the model performance using Data_A.

	Accuracy (%)	Sensitivity (%)	Specificity (%)	Precision (%)	F1 Score	AUC
Opt: Adam, Lr: ${\mathbf{10}}^{-\mathbf{4}}$, Lf: categorical_smooth_loss
Baseline	0.90468	0.81116	0.93631	0.83653	0.81355	0.87373
Without Bl. 3	+0.05351	+0.10556	+0.03475	+0.09229	+0.10647	+0.06838
Dual_Pachi	+0.06188	+0.12199	+0.04143	+0.10252	+0.12034	+0.08174
Opt: Adam, Lr:${\mathbf{10}}^{-\mathbf{3}}$, Lf: categorical cross-entropy
Baseline	0.91973	0.84466	0.94713	0.85426	0.84114	0.89426
Without Bl. 3	+0.03512	+0.06766	+0.02165	+0.06683	+0.07206	+0.0433
Dual_Pachi	+0.04014	+0.07281	+0.02542	+0.08076	+0.08119	+0.05084
Opt: SGD, Lr:${\mathbf{10}}^{-\mathbf{4}}$, Lf: categorical_smooth_loss
Baseline	0.88294	0.76244	0.92221	0.78338	0.76471	0.84442
Without Bl. 3	+0.03512	+0.07574	+0.02281	+0.06488	+0.07308	+0.07971
Dual_Pachi	+0.05184	+0.10519	+0.03412	+0.09559	+0.10359	+0.06823