Table 5.
Effect of anethole rich fraction on lipid profile
| PARAMETERS | TC (mg/dl) | TG (mg/dl) | LDL (mg/dl) | VLDL (mg/dl) | HDL (mg/dl) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 102.5 ± 2.64 | 70.34 ± 2.14 | 14.14 ± 2.05 | 32.95 ± 0.654 | 54.64 ± 0.45 |
| Junk food fed group | 285.4 ± 2.45* | 205.27 ± 3.17* | 173.67 ± 2.25* | 91.18 ± 0.15** | 25.06 ± 0.239** |
| Anethole rich fraction- low dose (50 mg/kg) | 131.42 ± 4.08** | 91.89 ± 1.25* | 48.97 ± 3.21** | 41.18 ± 0.364*** | 40.04 ± 0.19*** |
| Anethole rich fraction- low dose (100 mg/kg) | 114.24 ± 2.24*** | 62.78 ± 1.01** | 35.89 ± 2.46*** | 34.25 ± 0.82* | 44.05 ± 0.604*** |
Results of each group (n = 6) represents are depicted as mean ± SEM. The value comparison was made between the control and Group II, III, IV (*p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.05)