Table 5.
Evaluation and observation of usage of various existing models for millimeter wave propagation.
| Ref | Frequency (GHz) | Environment | Model | Observation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [29] | 28 and 73 | Indoor office | CI and FI | Simple CI models can be used in indoor wireless channels with the correctness even when using one or two functions that has a connection with the transmitted power. |
| [40] | 28, 38 and 73 | Indoor and outdoor | CI | It only provides data for future research. |
| [41] | 73.5 | Urban micro and macro cellular | CI and ABG | Simulation shows the accuracy of the CI model to be better than the ABG model as it offers a more stable and acceptable performance with greater level of accuracy. |
| [42] | 2 to 73 | Urban microcell and macro cell | CI, CIX and ABG | CI and CIF models show a better goodness of fit and more stable behavior of the components unlike the ABG. Inferring that CI is good for outdoor use. |
| [43] | 1 to 100 | Indoor office and shopping mall | 3GPP | There is more dependency on the value of the frequency in the indoor environments as compared to the outdoor environments. |
| [49] | 10, 20, and 26 | Indoor and outdoor | KED model | It shows that the KED model fits accurately with the indoor environment as well as rounded corners in outdoor scenarios. |
| [51] | 40 | Indoor | CI and FI | Analysis of the CI and FI models shows that they have similar values for the PLE and slop line. |