Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2021 Dec 14;74(4):495–502. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000003371

TABLE 2.

MRI-PDFF cohort (n=130)—descriptive statistics and univariate analyses with the liver fat fraction (liver PDFF) outcome

Variable name

Summary stats Parameter estimates (coefficients) Relationship with liver PDFF*
P value
Age (y) 15 (13,17) −0.21 0.564
Sex: male, n (%) 94 (72.3) 22.51 0.008
Ethnicity: non-Hispanic, n (%) 103 (79.2) 19.47 0.003
Type 2 diabetes mellitus, n (%) 12 (9.2) 28.28 0.015
Medication usage
 Insulin 5 (3.8) 30.40 0.050
 Metformin 30 (23.1) 24.23 0.062
 Vitamin E 5 (3.8) 22.49 0.750
 Statin 4 (3.1) 15.05 0.277
Physical examination data
 Obesity group, n (%) 0.592
 Overweight 4 (3.1) −3.79
 Obese Class I 22 (16.9) −3.17
 Severe obesity Class II 31 (23.8) −1.94
 Severe obesity Class III 73 (56.2) 22.06
BMI (kg/m2) 37.4 (32.6, 41.2) 0.06 0.705
BMI z score 2.56 (2.26, 2.73) 2.13 0.423
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 126 (118, 134) 0.01 0.897
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) 69 (63, 76) 0.17 0.126
Laboratory data
 ALT (U/L) 75 (56, 105) 7.34 <0.001
 AST (U/L) 35 (28, 52) 5.56 0.001
 AST_ALT ratio 0.48 (0.4, 0.59) −6.68 0.028
 GGT (U/L) 42.5 (28, 64) 1.54 0.279
 ALP (U/L) 145 (101, 237) 1.52 0.438
 Platelet (109/L) 294 (268, 334) 0.04 0.054
 Fasting glucose (mg/dL) 90 (86, 96) 10.43 0.124
 Fasting insulin level (mU/L) 24.1 (15.7, 32.4) 0.06 0.347
 HbA1C (%) 5.3 (5.1, 5.6) 24.97 0.005
 Triglycerides (mg/dL) 144 (98, 200) −0.24 0.898
 LDL (mg/dL) 87 (65, 112) −0.01 0.834
 HDL (mg/dL) 38 (33, 45) −0.10 0.371
MRI data
 Liver volume (mL) 2333 (1943, 2745)
 Liver PDFF (%) 21.1 (11, 29.9)

ALP = alkaline phosphatase; ALT = alanine aminotransferase; ANOVA = analysis of variance; AST = aspartate aminotransferase; BMI = body mass index; GGT = gamma glutamyl transpeptidase; HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c; HDL = high-density lipoprotein; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; PDFF = proton density fat fraction.

*

One-way ANOVA was used for categorical variable and linear regression was used for continuous variables.

Variables were log-transformed for the tests.