Table 2.

Step-wise linear regression model for mobility reduction, by date.

Mobility measured compare to the baseline	24 March 2020		31 March 2020		7 April 2020		14 April 2020
	Coeff (SD)	LMGa	Coeff (SD)	LMG	Coeff (SD)	LMG	Coeff (SD)	LMG
(Intercept)	0.00 (0.04)	-	0.00 (0.04)	-	0.00 (0.04)	-	0.000 (0.04)	-
Socio-economic status
Share of households in top household income quintile at national level	0.80∗∗∗ (0.07)	0.34	0.81∗∗∗ (0.07)	0.33	0.78∗∗∗ (0.07)	0.34	0.79∗∗∗ (0.07)	0.34
Share of non-English speakers	0.36∗∗∗ (0.07)	0.17	0.40∗∗∗ (0.07)	0.18	0.33∗∗∗ (0.07)	0.17	0.31∗∗∗ (0.07)	0.15
Share of social grade C1 (lower middle class)	0.51∗∗∗ (0.06)	0.08	0.54∗∗∗ (0.06)	0.09	0.50∗∗∗ (0.06)	0.08	0.53∗∗∗ (0.06)	0.09
Accessibility
Resident population density (1,000 inhabitants per km2)	0.37∗∗∗ (0.08)	0.29	0.35∗∗∗ (0.08)	0.27	0.40∗∗∗ (0.08)	0.29	0.42∗∗∗ (0.08)	0.28
Activity commitments
Share of self-employed workers in the resident population aged 16-74	-0.21∗∗∗ (0.06)	0.05	-0.25∗∗∗ (0.06)	0.05	-0.27∗∗∗ (0.07)	0.05	-0.22∗∗∗ (0.06)	0.06
Population health
Share of population in bad health	0.46∗∗∗ (0.07)	0.07	0.49∗∗∗ (0.08)	0.08	0.41∗∗∗ (0.08)	0.07	0.43∗∗∗ (0.07)	0.07

Model fit metrics
R2	0.73	0.71	0.71	0.74
Adjusted R2	0.72	0.71	0.70	0.74
Residual Std. Error (df = 184)	0.53	0.54	0.55	0.51
F Statistic (df = 6; 184)	82.36∗∗∗	76.66∗∗∗	73.5∗∗∗	89.27∗∗∗

Note: *p<0.1; **p<0.05; ***p<0.01.

^aRelative importance metric, the contribution of each variable of R² (Lindeman et al., 1980).