Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 17;27(46):2200845. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.46.2200845

Table. Annual carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter species bloodstream infections and carbapenem susceptibility testing results for Acinetobacter species bloodstream infections, in all laboratories that reported data to EARS-Net and in those that continuously reported data, EU/EEA countries, 2017–2021 (n = 31,242 infections).

Carbapenem susceptibility test result 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Number of cases in
2020–2021 vs 2018–2019
Number of cases in 2020
vs average 2017–2019
Number of cases in 2021
vs average 2017–2019
n % n % n % n % n % % Change p valuec % Change p valuec % Change p valuec
All laboratories (annual mean = 826 laboratories)a
R 2,831 59.2 3,105 60.1 2,629 56.5 4,379 65.2 7,396 74.5  +105.4 <0.001d +53.4 <0.001d +159.1 <0.001d
S/I 1,950 40.8 2,063 39.9 2,028 43.5 2,333 34.8 2,528 25.5  +18.8 <0.001 +15.9 <0.001 +25.5 <0.001
All 4,781 100.0 5,168 100.0 4,657 100.0 6,712 100.0 9,924 100.0  +69.3 <0.001 +37.9 <0.001 +103.8 <0.001
Continuously reporting laboratories (n = 255 laboratories)a,b
R 1,237 48.5 1,293 48.3 1,354 48.4 1,891 57.6 3,767 70.8  +113.8 <0.001d +46.1 <0.001d +191.0 <0.001d
R (Group 1 countriese) 30 3.6 37 4.4 17 1.9 29 3.3 23 2.3 −3.7 0.85 +3.6 0.90 −17.9 0.49
R (Group 2 countriese) 60 35.3 38 21.5 26 20.6 30 22.7 104 49.8 +109.4 <0.001d −27.4 0.18 +151,6 <0.001d
R (Group 3 countriese) 1,147 74.6 1,218 73.5 1,311 72.9 1,832 80.6 3,640 88.3 +116.4 <0.001d +49.5 <0.001d +197.1 <0.001d
S/I 1,314 51.5 1,382 51.7 1,444 51.6 1,390 42.4 1,554 29.2  +4.2 0.12 +0.7 0.85 +12.6 0.001
S/I/R 2,551 100.0 2,675 100.0 2,798 100.0 3,281 100.0 5,321 100.0  +57.2 <0.001 +22.7 <0.001 +98.9 <0.001

EARS-Net: European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network; EEA: European Economic Area; EU: European Union; I: susceptible, increased exposure; R: resistant; S: susceptible, standard dosing regimen.

a Data for France and the United Kingdom were excluded.

b Only includes EU/EEA laboratories that were identifiable as having reported ≥ 1 Acinetobacter spp. isolate with carbapenem susceptibility data every year in 2017–2021.

c Poisson regression model to assess the statistical significance of changes in the numbers of bloodstream infections.

d The chi-squared test comparing the percentage of carbapenem resistance in 2020–2021 vs 2018–2019 also had p < 0.001.

e The reporting countries were grouped according to the mean of their crude, national, annual percentage of Acinetobacter spp. resistance to carbapenems in 2018 and 2019. These were Group 1 (< 10% carbapenem resistance in 2018–2019): Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden; Group 2 (10% to < 50% carbapenem resistance in 2018–2019): Czechia, Portugal, and Slovenia; Group 3 (≥ 50% carbapenem resistance in 2018–2019): Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Spain. Percentages in these rows refer to carbapenem-resistant isolates among all isolates analysed for the countries in a given group. The raw data for the group level are provided in the Supplement.