Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 17;22:1185. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10284-1

Table 3.

The subgroup analysis in PFS of patients with high TMB compared to low TMB

Subgroup Number of study Effects model Pooled ES Heterogeneity
HR [95% CI] P I2 P-Value
Type of therapy
 ICIs 4 Fixed 0.52[0.35,0.77]  < 0.001 50.3% 0.110
 Non-ICIs 5 Random 2.31[0.89,5.97] 0.086 68.5% 0.013
Breast cancer subtype
 HER2 +  4 Random 3.26[0.64,16.71] 0.156 74.2% 0.009
 TNBC 4 Fixed 0.52[0.35,0.77] 0.001 50.3% 0.110
Sample source
 tumor 5 Fixed 0.53[0.38,0.74]  < 0.001 35.4% 0.185
 blood 4 Fixed 3.37[1.34,8.44] 0.01 38.1% 0.183
TMB detection method
 NGS 8 Random 1.04[0.54,2.01] 0.909 83.4%  < 0.001
 WES 1 - 0.63[0.28,1.14] - - -
TMB cutoff value
  ≤ 5 Mut/Mb 4 Fixed 3.37[1.34,8.44] 0.01 38.1% 0.183
  > 5 Mut/Mb 4 Fixed 0.52[0.35,0.77] 0.001 50.3% 0.110