Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 17;22:299. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-02028-9

Table 8.

different ranking results with different λ

λ=2 λ=3 λ=4 λ=6 λ=8 λ=10
Similarity Factors Similarity Factors Similarity Factors Similarity Factors Similarity Factors Similarity Factors
0.6346 C8 0.8071 C8 0.9049 C8 0.9766 C8 0.9942 C8 0.9986 C8
0.7467 C1 0.8590 C1 0.9299 C1 0.9833 C1 0.9961 C1 0.9991 C1
0.7539 C4 0.8625 C4 0.9313 C4 0.9835 C4 0.9961 C4 0.9991 C4
0.7642 C7 0.8775 C7 0.9424 C7 0.9876 C7 0.9974 C7 0.9994 C7
0.8393 C6 0.9145 C6 0.9571 C6 0.9898 C6 0.9977 C6 0.9995 C6
0.8397 C2 0.9154 C2 0.9604 C2 0.9918 C2 0.9983 C2 0.9997 C2
0.8785 C3 0.9339 C3 0.9694 C3 0.9941 C3 0.9989 C3 0.9998 C3
0.8810 C5 0.9471 C5 0.9789 C5 0.9968 C5 0.9995 C5 0.9999 C9
0.8943 C9 0.9555 C9 0.9817 C9 0.9970 C9 0.9995 C9 0.9999 C5
0.9082 C11 0.9679 C11 0.9884 C11 0.9982 C12 0.9997 C11 0.9999 C11
0.9193 C12 0.9696 C12 0.9887 C12 0.9983 C11 0.9997 C12 1.0000 C12
0.9562 C10 0.9800 C10 0.9926 C10 0.9991 C10 0.9999 C10 1.0000 C10