Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 17;106(1):110. doi: 10.5334/jbsr.2971

Table 2.

Distribution of the thymic density according to age.


THYMIC ATTENUATION ASSESSMENT GROUP 1 (0–12 MONTHS) GROUP 2 (1–3 YEARS) GROUP 3 (4–6 YEARS) GROUP 4 (7–10 YEARS) GROUP 5 (11–14 YEARS) GROUP 6 (15–18 YEARS) P-VALUE

Thymic score Score 1 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 3 (0.6%) p = 0.006

Score 2 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 14 (3.0%) p < 0.0001

Score 3 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 5 (1.1%) 13 (2.8%) 38 (8.2%) p < 0.0001

Score 4 24 (5.2%) 94 (20.3%) 83 (17.9%) 67 (14.4%) 91 (19.6%) 32 (6.9%) p < 0.0001

CT attenuation values (HU) Male 73.7 ± 8.4 (61.2–89.3) 75.4 ± 11.8 (53.4–104.6) 73.4 ± 13.0 (22.9–90.2) 67.1 ± 13.1 (22.1–90.3) 56.2 ± 19.8 (6–93.2) 25.0 ± 26.7 (-40.2–71.7) pa = 0.029

Female 70.8 ± 10.2 (58.2–81.7) 74.8 ± 11.8 (51.1–97.5) 72.4 ± 9.2 (58.1–94.6) 66.8 ± 13.5 (42.1–88.6) 63.8 ± 17.6 (20.1–93.5) 39.2 ± 33.8 (-27.6–98.1) pb = 0.213

Total 73.2 ± 8.6 (58.2–89.3) 75.2 ± 11.7 (51.1–104.6) 72.9 ± 11.2 (22.9–94.6) 67.0 ± 13.2 (22.1–90.3) 59.9 ± 19.1 (6.0–93.5) 30.9 ± 30.5 (–40.2–98.1) pc = 0.002

Abbreviations: Score 0, complete fatty replacement; Score 1, mainly fatty thymus; Score 2, 50% of fatty and 50% of the soft-tissue attenuated thymus; Score 3, mainly soft-tissue attenuated thymus;

Data are expressed as number (n) and percentage (%); mean ± standard deviation (SD), range (minimum to maximum value);

p – values for comparing each thymic score between age groups;

pa – values for comparing CT attenuation values among boys between age groups;

pb – values for comparing CT attenuation values among girls between age groups;

pc – values for comparing CT attenuation values between age groups;

p – values were obtained using the Chi-square test and ANOVA – post hoc Bonferroni test; p – values <0.05 were considered significant.