TABLE 6.
Logistic regression analyses of FAPs for predicting MCI.
Unadjusted | Adjusteda | |||||
|
|
|||||
β | OR (95%CI) | p | β | OR (95%CI) | p | |
FAP1 | 0.403 | 0.297 | ||||
T1 | 1[Ref.] | 1[Ref.] | NA | 1[Ref.] | 1[Ref.] | NA |
T2 | −0.724 | 0.485 (0.122, 1.922) | 0.303 | −1.100 | 0.333 (0.072, 1.529) | 0.157 |
T3 | 0.182 | 1.200 (0.281, 5.124) | 0.806 | −0.132 | 0.876 (0.184, 4.173) | 0.868 |
FAP2 | 0.024* | 0.018* | ||||
T1 | 1[Ref.] | 1[Ref.] | NA | 1[Ref.] | 1[Ref.] | NA |
T2 | −0.143 | 0.867 (0.187, 4.007) | 0.855 | −0.048 | 0.953 (0.185, 4.907) | 0.954 |
T3 | −1.887 | 0.152 (0.032, 0.713) | 0.017* | −2.223 | 0.108 (0.019, 0.623) | 0.013* |
FAP3 | 0.172 | 0.226 | ||||
T1 | 1[Ref.] | 1[Ref.] | NA | 1[Ref.] | 1[Ref.] | NA |
T2 | −0.608 | 0.544 (0.137, 2.167) | 0.388 | −0.465 | 0.628 (0.147, 2.690) | 0.531 |
T3 | 0.822 | 2.275 (0.518, 9.989) | 0.276 | 0.897 | 2.453 (0.521, 11.558) | 0.257 |
FAP4 | 0.649 | 0.571 | ||||
T1 | 1[Ref.] | 1[Ref.] | NA | 1[Ref.] | 1[Ref.] | NA |
T2 | 0.671 | 0.867 (0.187, 4.007) | 0.356 | 0.790 | 2.204 (0.487, 9.975) | 0.305 |
T3 | 0.239 | 0.152 (0.032, 0.713) | 0.730 | 0.180 | 1.197 (0.285, 5.033) | 0.806 |
FAP6 | 0.268 | 0.393 | ||||
T1 | 1[Ref.] | 1[Ref.] | NA | 1[Ref.] | 1[Ref.] | NA |
T2 | −0.857 | 0.424 (0.104, 1.724) | 0.231 | −0.819 | 0.441 (0.102, 1.910) | 0.274 |
T3 | 0.269 | 1.309 (0.310, 5.533) | 0.714 | 0.135 | 1.145 (0.254, 5.169) | 0.860 |
OR, odds ratio; FAP, fatty acid patterns. aData were adjusted by BMR. *p < 0.05.