Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Stigma Health. 2022 Aug 4;7(4):443–453. doi: 10.1037/sah0000404

Table 2.

Multivariable logistic regression results of the association between different HIV stigma experiences and adherence

Variables Case Adherence Index VAS Adherence (=100%) VAS Adherence (≥90%)
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
HIV stigma experiences
Perceived 1.11 0.74, 1.67 1.00 0.73, 1.39 0.93 0.61, 1.43
Internalized 0.64** 0.46, 0.89 0.98 0.77, 1.23 0.95 0.72, 1.27
Enacted 0.84 0.62, 1.14 1.20 0.85, 1.70 1.24 0.79, 1.93
Covariates
Age 0.90 0.68, 1.18 0.96 0.77, 1.20 0.85 0.64, 1.13
Gender (ref = female) 2.01 0.33, 12.30 0.74 0.22, 2.42 0.58 0.12, 2.70
Health facility (ref = Chipata Central) 2.28 0.28, 18.43 1.10 0.28, 4.36 1.06 0.18, 6.19
Currently in school (ref = no) 0.39 0.03, 4.49 1.42 0.28, 7.21 2.45 0.36, 16.56
Worked in the last 30 days (ref = no) 0.41 0.04, 4.67 1.03 0.20, 5.24 1.88 0.27, 13.21
Attitudes toward living at home 0.99 0.75, 1.31 1.20 0.99, 1.46 1.12 0.88, 1.43

Note. OR = odds ratio, CI = confidence intervals.

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001.