Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2022 Oct 20;14(10):e30520. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30520

The Y-Pelvic Osteotomy in Treating Bladder Exstrophy: A Surgical Technique

Sattar Alshryda 1,2,, Ibrar Majid 3, Ghadir Jaber 4, Diary Mohammad 4, Mamoun Al Marzouqi 5
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC9674189  PMID: 36415431

Abstract

Bladder exstrophy (BE) is a rare congenital anomaly caused by an embryological defect in the closure of the abdominal wall. It comprises a spectrum of defects about severity, including epispadias in the mildest form and cloacal exstrophy in the worst.

Surgical correction is required to achieve urinary continence, maintain normal renal function, achieve secured abdominal wall closure, and create cosmetically and functionally satisfactory genitalia. Iliac bone osteotomy is considered essential to achieve the above goals in most patients by reducing the tension of the closed abdominal wall layers, particularly when present late in infancy.

Several types of pelvic iliac bone osteotomy have been described to aid bladder and cloacal exstrophy closure. They can be grouped into posterior iliac osteotomy, anterior iliac osteotomy, oblique (also called diagonal) iliac osteotomy, and a combination of posterior and anterior iliac osteotomy.

We described here the Y-pelvic osteotomy, which was developed by the Manchester Orthopaedic Group in the United Kingdom. It has the advantage of anterior and posterior osteotomies but also has less risk to the neurovascular structures, less blood loss, and ease of surgical technique. The osteotomy was named the Y-pelvic osteotomy due to the morphological shape it resembles.

Keywords: cloacal exstrophy, epispadias and bladder exstrophy, pelvis osteotomy, persistent cloaca, bladder reconstruction

Introduction

Bladder exstrophy (BE) is a rare congenital anomaly caused by an embryological defect in the closure of the abdominal wall. There is a wide spectrum of severity. Epispadias represents the mildest form of exstrophy whereas cloacal exstrophy is the most severe. 

The condition is uncommon. The reported incidence of BE ranges from 1 in 30,000 to 1 in 50,000. Cloacal exstrophy is even rarer with a reported incidence of 1 in 200,000 to 1 in 400,000. Males are affected two to three times more often than females [1-4].

Surgical correction is required to achieve urinary continence, maintain normal renal function, and create cosmetically and functionally satisfactory genitalia [5]. Iliac bone osteotomy is considered essential to achieve the above goals in the majority of patients [6,7].

Historically, posterior iliac osteotomy was the earliest type to be introduced. This type of osteotomy was challenging at many levels. It was performed with the patient initially in the prone position and then flipped over to the supine position. Anterior iliac osteotomy includes various modifications but the most common by far is the Salter innominate osteotomy. This involves dividing the iliac bone midway between the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and the anterior inferior iliac spine at the front and the greater sciatic notch (GSN) at the back. The main risk of anterior iliac osteotomy is compressing the neurovascular structures against the inguinal ligament. The oblique iliac osteotomy (also called the diagonal iliac osteotomy) was introduced to overcome the above problem as it divided the iliac bone proximal to the inguinal ligament attachment [1,8-10].

We described here the Y-pelvic osteotomy, which was developed by the Manchester Orthopaedic Group in the United Kingdom [11]. It combines two osteotomies in the shape of the English letter (Y), the oblique iliac L-shaped osteotomy and the posterior iliac bone osteotomy. The former is a complete osteotomy whereas the latter is a partial osteotomy. Y-pelvic osteotomy permits more tissue excursion reducing the tension of the closed abdominal layers. It has less risk to the neurovascular structures, it is associated with less blood loss, and the technique is relatively simple. The osteotomy was named the Y-pelvic osteotomy due to the morphological shape it resembles.

Technical report

The operation is performed under general anesthesia with the child in the supine position. An intravenous line, arterial line, and ECG monitoring are secured by the anesthesia team. A Bovie disposable, single-use grounding pad is applied on the right side of the chest above the costal margin (Figure 1). A warming device should be applied to prevent hypothermia. The surgical field is prepared using chlorohexidine from the costal margin to the feet. Wide-spectrum prophylactic antibiotics are administered at induction.

Figure 1. A newborn child with bladder exstrophy.

Figure 1

Notice the open abdominal wall and urinary bladder and the underdeveloped genitalia.

The Y-iliac bone osteotomy is performed after mobilization and reconstruction of the bladder and bladder neck by the urologist. The abdominal wound is covered with wet gauze and Tegaderm. The skin is cleaned again with chlorohexidine to ensure sterility. A sterile rolled towel is placed beneath the ipsilateral buttock after draping. A Smith-Peterson approach is utilized through a bikini groin incision. The incision is made below and parallel to the iliac crest. The latter is more lateral in a patient with BE in comparison to children with dislocated hips. The soft tissue and the abdominal muscles are peeled off the iliac apophysis to expose its outer half only (Figure 2). Then the medial (lower) part of the approach is developed further by identifying and protecting the lateral cutaneous nerve of the thigh.

Figure 2. Intraoperative clinical photograph.

Figure 2

The abdominal muscles peeled off the iliac apophysis (dashed green arrow). The lateral cutaneous nerve of the thigh is identified and protected through the whole procedure (curved green arrow). Black arrow points to the orientation of the patient and points cranially.

The plane between tensor fascia lata and sartorius is developed down to the bony ridge between the anterior superior and inferior iliac spines. The iliac apophysis is split and both sides of the iliac wing are exposed down to the GSN using a periosteal elevator (Figure 3). We do not recommend dividing the psoas or rectus muscle tendons. The external fixator half pin is inserted percutaneously under direct vision from the buttock (Figure 4). We use small or medium external fixator systems depending on the size of the child (Orthofix Medical Inc, Texas, USA). The half pins can be self-drilling and tapping to ease the fixation, but standard half pins can be used as well. We screen the hip clinically to ensure there is no joint penetration. We do not normally use fluoroscopy screening.

Figure 3. Intraoperative clinical photograph.

Figure 3

The photograph shows the exposed inner aspect of the iliac wing. The iliac apophysis is split over the iliac crest (solid green arrow) into a medial half (straight dashed red arrow) and lateral half (green curved dashed arrow).

Figure 4. Intraoperative image.

Figure 4

The insertion of external fixation half pin under direct vision. The entry point and the exit point should be visible during the insertion. Free hip movement is used as an indicator that there is no hip joint penetration.

The Y-osteotomy consists of two osteotomies: an L-shaped oblique complete osteotomy and a vertical partial osteotomy that runs parallel to the sacro-iliac joint (SIJ) (Figure 5). The first cut is made by the osteotome, and it starts at the pelvic brim, midway between the inserted half pin and the lower part of the SIJ. It extends superior-medial to inferior lateral away from the SIJ to avoid inadvertent damage to the joint. The second cut is made using an oscillating saw and it extends from the iliac crest, 1 cm proximal to the ASIS, toward the top of the first cut. Both (the first and second cuts) should pass at least 5 mm above the external fixator half pins (Figure 5). This is to ensure adequate bone bridge around the pins to reduce the risk of cutting through. The two cuts create the L-shaped osteotomy, which is a complete (full bone thickness) cut. The two fragments should be tested for free movement before proceeding with the third cut.

Figure 5. A diagram showing the planned bony cuts of the Y-pelvic osteotomy.

Figure 5

Top image (A) is an anteroposterior (AP) view of pelvis CT scan and bottom image (B) is inferosuperior view of pelvis CT scan. The L-shaped bony cut is marked in red and it extends just behind the anterior superior iliac spine toward the pelvis brim then turns forward away from the sacro-iliac joint. The small arm cut is performed first (denoted by red circle 1)  because this cut has to be very precise. Its location prevents inadvertent damage to the sacro-iliac joint or breaching the half pin tracts. The vertical posterior partial (dashed green line) cut extends from the angle of the “L-shaped cut” upward and parallel to the sacro-iliac joint. 

The third cut (or vertical partial osteotomy) extends from the angle of the L-shaped osteotomy upward and parallel to the SIJ. It is placed about 1 cm lateral to the SIJ. It is an incomplete osteotomy where the inner cortex and the cancellous bone only are cut leaving the outside cortex and periosteum intact (Figure 6). This allows the triangular fragment between the two cuts to fold inward. This further allows the pubic rami to come close to each other by allowing the soft tissue to move more toward the midline. The pubic bones can be closed easily following the Y-pelvic osteotomy. The urologist then completes the soft tissue closure by bringing the two pubic bones together using a strong Ticron suture and closing the abdominal wall in layers. The external fixator is then assembled to prevent any tension on the surgical repair. Lower limbs are kept together using the Mermaid dressing (Figure 7). The patient is admitted to a high-dependency unit after surgery for 24-48 hours. Postoperative x-ray is taken at three weeks, and if there is enough callus (Figure 8), the external fixator is removed in the ward. The patient is given painkillers an hour before removal.

Figure 6. Intraoperative clinical photograph.

Figure 6

Top image (A) shows the iliac bone before performing the osteotomies whereas the bottom image (B) shows the iliac bone after performing the osteotomies. The vertical incomplete cut (dashed green line) which is created using an osteotome to score the inner cortex of the iliac bone starting from the angle of the L-shaped osteotomy upward. Two incomplete, parallel and 2 mm apart cuts (like a train track) are made using an osteotome. The 2 mm cortex in-between is then peeled off leaving the outer cortex and periosteum intact. This allows the iliac bone to fold inward (dashed yellow arrow) to allow soft tissue (solid yellow line) to come closer to the midline.  

Figure 7. Postoperative clinical photograph.

Figure 7

The photograph shows the assembled external fixator and mermaid dressing.

Figure 8. Postoperative plain radiograph.

Figure 8

The image shows healed osteotomies with the pins not penetrating the hip joints.

Discussion

Trendelenburg was the first to introduce an orthopedic procedure (bilateral SIJ osteotomy) to facilitate BE closure in 1892. Unfortunately, his first patient died as a result of anemia and complications, and this put a halt on further pelvic osteotomy for BE for a long time [12-14]. Shultz was accredited with the first successful bilateral posterior osteotomy in BE in 1958. The technique immediately gained popularity and became a routine part of BE closure [9,15]. Several shortfalls with the posterior osteotomy technique became apparent and led surgeons to search for a better technique. Posterior iliac osteotomies were performed with the patient in the prone position, which is challenging for the anesthesia team. The thicker iliac bone and soft tissue covering posteriorly caused increased blood loss and postoperative pain. Myelomeningoceles are not uncommon in cloacal exstrophy. The incision for posterior iliac osteotomy can be very close to the myelomeningocele closure, which could lead to skin problems. After osteotomies are completed, the patient must be flipped over to the supine position for the urogenital reconstruction which is not free of risk. This also means that osteotomies fine-tuning to allow tension-free closure is not possible or at least more complicated.

Several authors proposed performing pubic bone osteotomy through the same incision of the urological repair. The bones are accessible, there is less blood loss, and it is technically easy. It was also proposed that the osteotomy could be performed by a urologist without the need for an orthopedic surgeon. Although this allows the two ends of the pubic bones to come very close together, the technique was not successful in providing an effective way to reduce the tension from surgical closure. This is partly because the abdominal muscles are attached laterally to the pubic bones [16]. Interestingly, there has been a recent interest in reviving this technique [17-19].

The innominate osteotomy was popularized by Salter to treat congenital dislocation of the hip [20]. It was then utilized in failed or revision BE repair. It was then extended successfully for primary closure [21-25]. The main problem with the innominate osteotomy is that the bony cut and subsequent rotation comprises the space available for the femoral sheath and its contents including the femoral nerve and vessels. 

Sponseller and colleagues introduced the “combined approach” for older children by adding an incomplete vertical posterior iliac osteotomy [26]. The purpose of the vertical incision is to compensate for the loss of elasticity of the SIJ in older children. Unfortunately, the use of this combined procedure has not eliminated the risk of nerve injury. Segev reported three nerve injuries in four patients. Although two had a complete recovery, the third continued to suffer from foot drop [27].

The Y-pelvic osteotomy overcomes the problems that current techniques have. It is posterior to the inguinal ligament attachment; therefore, there is a very low risk of compressing the neurovascular structures within the inguinal sheath that could occur in an innominate Salter pelvic osteotomy. Moreover, the abdominal wall muscles are attached more posteriorly to the iliac wings. Anterior osteotomy alone is not effective to bring these muscles closer together anteriorly for closure without tension. The Y-pelvic osteotomy allows the attachments of the abdominal muscles to move forward and medially to facilitate closure. The first cut is through the thinnest part of the iliac bone and the vertical cut is not complete. Both do not cause excessive blood loss in comparison to other techniques.

Conclusions

The proposed "Y-type" pelvic osteotomy combines the benefit of the oblique (diagonal) pelvic osteotomy in protecting the neurovascular structures in the femoral sheath, and the posterior pelvic osteotomy to provide a more efficient way to mobilize the lower abdominal wall muscles. Although it was initially introduced for patients with symphysis diastasis of more than 6 cm, it has become a standard procedure in treating our patients with BE because it is simple, effective, bleeds less, and takes just a little extra time (around 5 minutes more) than the oblique osteotomy alone. Our urologist colleagues believe that the Y-pelvic osteotomy allows an easier closure with less tension on the abdominal structure in comparison to the previously used osteotomies.

The above-stated advantages are currently being evaluated in relation to important clinical outcomes including hemoglobin drop, blood transfusion rate and volume, length of stay, and dehiscence rate. These will be the subject of our next publication. Given the complexity of the condition and the multiple factors that can influence the above clinical outcomes, a large number of patients are required to demonstrate the value of the Y-pelvic osteotomy. 

Acknowledgments

The technique was developed by several surgeons of the Royal Manchester Children Hospital over the years which was inspired by the work of various authors around the globe.

The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study

Animal Ethics

Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.

References

  • 1.Anterior innominate osteotomy in repair of bladder exstrophy. Sponseller PD, Jani MM, Jeffs RD, Gearhart JP. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:184–193. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200102000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Anterior innominate osteotomies for failure or late closure of bladder exstrophy. Sponseller PD, Gearhart JP, Jeffs RD. J Urol. 1991;146:137–140. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37732-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Contemporary epidemiology of bladder exstrophy in the United States. Nelson CP, Dunn RL, Wei JT. J Urol. 2005;173:1728–1731. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000154821.21521.9b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Prospective study on the incidence of bladder/cloacal exstrophy and epispadias in Europe. Cervellione RM, Mantovani A, Gearhart J, Bogaert G, Gobet R, Caione P, Dickson AP. J Pediatr Urol. 2015;11:337–336. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.03.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.The pelvis of fetuses in the exstrophy complex. Wakim A, Barbet JP, Lair-Milan F, Dubousset J. https://journals.lww.com/pedorthopaedics/Abstract/1997/05000/The_Pelvis_of_Fetuses_in_the_Exstrophy_Complex.24.aspx. J Pediatr Orthop. 1997;17:402–405. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Closure of the exstrophic bladder: an evaluation of the factors leading to its success and its importance on urinary continence. Husmann DA, McLorie GA, Churchill BM. J Urol. 1989;142:522–524. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38803-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Iliac osteotomy: a model to compare the options in bladder and cloacal exstrophy reconstruction. McKenna PH, Khoury AE, McLorie GA, Churchill BM, Babyn PB, Wedge JH. J Urol. 1994;151:182–186. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)34912-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Oblique pelvic osteotomy in the exstrophy/epispadias complex. Jones D, Parkinson S, Hosalkar HS. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:799–806. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B6.17712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Plastic repair of exstrophy of bladder combined with bilateral osteotomy of ilia. Shultz WG. J Urol. 1958;79:453–458. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)66294-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Exstrophy of the bladder: long-term results of bilateral posterior iliac osteotomies and two-stage anatomic repair. Aadalen RJ, O'Phelan EH, Chisholm TC, McParland FA Jr, Sweetser TH Jr. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7418304/ Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980:193–200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Alshryda S, Howard JJ, Huntley JS, Schoenecker JG. The Pediatric and Adolescent Hip: Essentials and Evidence. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.De la cure operatoire de l’exstrophie vesicale et del’epispadias. Trendelenburg F. Arch Klin Chir. 1892;43:394. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.A short history of bladder exstrophy. Buyukunal CS, Gearhart JP. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2011;20:62–65. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2011.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.III. The operative treatment for exstrophy of the bladder. Hartley F. Ann Surg. 1901;34:25–60. doi: 10.1097/00000658-190107000-00003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pelvic osteotomy in the modern treatment of the exstrophy-epispadias complex. Purves JT, Gearhart JP. http://10.1016/j.eeus.2007.07.002 EAU-EBU Update Series. 2007;5:188–196. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Anterior pelvic osteotomy. A new operative technique facilitating primary bladder exstrophy closure. Frey P, Cohen SJ. Br J Urol. 1989;64:641–643. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1989.tb05327.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Closure of bladder exstrophy with a bilateral anterior pubic osteotomy: revival of an old technique. Elsayed ER, Alam MN, Sarhan OM, Elsayed D, Eliwa AM, Khalil S. Arab J Urol. 2011;9:203–206. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2011.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.IschioPubic osteotomy, a simple and effective technique for pelvic ring closure in repair of classic exstrophy bladder. Sunil K, Kureel SN, Gupta A, Pandey A, Wakhlu A, Rawat J. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2018;23:27–31. doi: 10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_206_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gradual bone transfer for the correction of the pubic diastasis using the Ilizarov technique in closure of bladder and cloacal exstrophy. Kusakabe H, Ueoka K, Takayama S, Seki A. J Orthop Sci. 2018;23:144–150. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2017.08.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.The first fifteen year's personal experience with innominate osteotomy in the treatment of congenital dislocation and subluxation of the hip. Salter RB, Dubos JP. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1974:72–103. doi: 10.1097/00003086-197401000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Horizontal pelvic osteotomies for bladder exstrophy. A preliminary report. Gibbon AJ, Maffulli N, Fixsen JA. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73:896–898. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.73B6.1955431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bilateral transverse iliac osteotomy in the correction of neonatal bladder extrophies. Gökçora IH, Yazar T. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2753622/ Int Surg. 1989;74:123–125. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Innominate osteotomy in reconstructive surgery for exstrophy of the bladder. Montagnani CA. J Pediatr Surg. 1967;2:583–589. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(67)80018-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.One stage functional reconstruction of exstrophied bladder: report of two cases with six-year follow-up. Montagnani CA. Z Kinderchir. 1982;37:23–27. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1059810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Functional reconstruction of exstrophied bladder. Timing and technique. Follow-up of 39 cases. Montagnani CA. Z Kinderchir. 1988;43:322–330. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1043477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pelvic floor anatomy in classic bladder exstrophy using 3-dimensional computerized tomography: initial insights. Stec AA, Pannu HK, Tadros YE, Sponseller PD, Fishman EK, Gearhart JP. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11547108/ J Urol. 2001;166:1444–1449. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.A combined vertical and horizontal pelvic osteotomy approach for repair of bladder exstrophy: the Dana experience. Segev E, Ezra E, Binyamini Y, Wientroub S, Ben-Chaim J. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15609888/ Isr Med Assoc J. 2004;6:749–752. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES