Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct-Dec;23(4):231–246. doi: 10.18502/jri.v23i4.10808

Supplementary File 3.

GRADE table of findings

Certainty assessment No of patients Effect Certainty Importance

No. of studies Study design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations Preimplantation genetic diagnosis Morphology assessment alone Relative (95% CI) Absolute (95% CI)
Live birth rate per embryo transfer
5 Randomized trials Serious a Serious b Not serious Serious c None 321/603 (53.2%) 315/743 (42.4%) OR 1.66 (0.98 to 2.83) 13 more per 100 (from 0 fewer to 25 more) ⊕◯◯◯
Very low
Critical
Live birth rate per embryo transfer
3 Observational studies Very serious d Serious b Not serious Serious e All plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed 107/231 (46.3%) 247/462 (53.5%) OR 1.45 (0.24 to 8.78) 9 more per 100 (from 32 fewer to 38 more) ⊕◯◯◯
Very low
Critical
Clinical pregnancy per embryo transfer
5 Randomized trials Serious a Serious f Not serious Not serious None 351/658 (53.1%) 361/791 (45.6%) OR 1.43 (0.96 to 2.13) 9 more per 100 (from 1 fewer to 18 more) ⊕⊕◯◯
Low
Important
Clinical pregnancy per embryo transfer
4 Observational studies Very serious d Not serious Not serious Serious c All plausible residual confounding would suggest spurious effect, while no effect was observed 168/316 (53.2%) 185/503 (36.8%) OR 3.08 (2.22 to 4.29) 27 more per 100 (from 20 more to 35 more) ⊕⊕◯◯
low
Important
Miscarriage rate per embryo transfer
5 Randomized trials Serious a Serious f Not serious Serious e None 40/610 (6.6%) 75/800 (9.4%) OR 0.57 (0.27 to 1.21) 4 fewer per 100 (from 7 fewer to 2 more) ⊕◯◯◯
very low
Important
Miscarriage rate per embryo transfer
2 Observational studies Very serious d Very serious b Not serious Very serious e None 9/141 (6.4%) 10/163 (6.1%) OR 1.25 (0.19 to 8.33) 1 more per 100 (from 5 fewer to 29 more) ⊕◯◯◯
very low
Important

CI: Confidence interval; OR: Odds ratio

a:

Most included studies were between some concerns and high risk of bias;

b:

There is a high level of heterogeneity and poor overlap of 95% CI;

c:

There is a small sample of embryo transfer, which makes the estimate imprecise;

d:

Included studies were all between moderate and critical risk of bias;

e:

Imprecise 95% CI;

f:

Poor overlap of 95% CI