Table 2.
The ANOVA results for the effects of a fertilizer-N x -P factorial on maize yield conducted for two years at Iburu and Zaria.
| Source of variation | SPAD (plant−1) | IPAR (%) | LAI (m2 m−2) | Number of Grains (m−2) | TDM (kg ha−1) | GY (kg ha−1) | PNU (kg ha−1) | NRE (kg kg−1) | AE (kg kg−1) | NUTE (kg ha−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iburu | ||||||||||
| Nitrogen (N) | ∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗ | ns | ∗∗ | ∗ |
| Yr × N | ns | ns | ns | ns | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | Ns |
| Phosphorus (P) | ∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗ |
| Yr × P | ns | ∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ns | Ns | ns | ns | ns | Ns |
| N × P | ns | ∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗∗ | ns | ns | ∗ | Ns |
| Yr × N × P | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | Ns | ns | ns | ns | Ns |
| Zaria | ||||||||||
| Nitrogen (N) | ∗∗ | ∗ | ∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗ | ns | ∗ |
| Yr × N | ns | ns | ns | ∗∗ | ∗ | Ns | ns | ns | ns | Ns |
| Phosphorus (P) | ∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗ |
| Yr × P | ∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗ | ∗∗ | ns | Ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
| N × P | ns | ns | ns | ∗∗ | ns | ∗∗ | ∗∗ | ns | ns | ∗ |
| Yr × N × P | ns | ns | ns | ∗ | ns | Ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
Yr = year, SPAD = soil plant analysis development, IPAR = intercepted photosynthetically active radiation, LAI = leaf area index, TDM = total dry matter, GY = Grain yield, PNU = total plant nitrogen uptake, AE = agronomic efficiency, NRE = nitrogen recovery efficiency, NUTE = N utilization efficiency.