Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 12;74(6):1995–2001. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01378-3

Table 2.

Operative parameters

BHM group CRM group P value
Duration median (IQR), min 162 (51–493) 157 (36–511) 0.55
Mesh position
 IPOM 11 (39.3%) 26 (60.5%) 0.35
 Sublay 9 (32.1%) 5 (11.6%)
 Bridging 8 (28.6%) 11 (25.6%)
 Onlay 0 (0%) 1 (2.3%)
Fascial closure

Yes

20 (71.4%)

No

8 (28.6%)

Yes

32 (74.4%)

No

11 (25.6%)

0.79
Primary wound closure

Yes

26 (92.9%)

No

2 (7.1%)

Yes

32 (74.4%)

No

11 (25.6%)

0.06
Drainage
 Intraabdominal

Yes

16 (57.1%)

No

12 (42.9%)

Yes

27 (62.8%)

No

16 (37.2%)

0.64
 Subcutaneous 23 (82.1%) 5 (17.9%) 25 (58.1%) 18 (41.9) 0.00*
 Mesh 15 (53.6%) 13 (46.4%) 6 (14%) 37 (86%) 0.04**
Sterile operation site

Yes

20 (71.4%)

No

8 (28.6%)

Yes

23 (54.8%)

No

19 (45.2%)

0.17

*In significant more patients subcutaneous drainage were placed in the BHM group (CI 0.95)

**In significant more patients mesh-located drainage were placed in the BHM group (CI 0.95)