Table 1.

Clinical outcome data (for this case series and existing literature)

	Study design	Number of cases	Number of cases with Mason type III/type IV injuries	Number of cases with collateral ligament injuries	Number of cases with a terrible triad	Number of cases with a Monteggia fracture	Number of cases with fractures of the coronoid process	Mean follow-up in months (range)	Mean age in years (range)	Mean flexion in degrees (range)
Businger et al. [16]	Retrospective case series	6	2/4	3	1	1	2	112 (47–157)	40 (24–48)	141 (136–146)
Kumar et al. [17]	Retrospective case series	6	6/0	3	0	0	0	25 (12–30)	35 (25–46)	135 (125–140)
Everding et al. [18]	Retrospective case series	9	2/7	8	2	4	2	39 (11–64)	47 (22–64)	120 (100–140)
This study	Retrospective case series	14	9/5	7	3	0	6	50 (16–128)	41 (21–69)	126 (110–145)
Cumulative calculations		35	19/16	21	6	5	10	54 (11–157)	41 (21–69	129 (100–146)

	Mean loss of extension in degrees (range)	Mean pronation in degrees (range)	Mean supination in degrees (range)	Grip strength in % of the uninjured wrist (range)	Mayo Elbow Performance Index (range)	Broberg and Morrey Functional Rating Index	Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score	Return to pre-injury occupation/%
Businger et al. [16]	6 (0–15)	79 (68–85)	70 (32–90)	92 (74–104)	99 (95–100)	97 (93–100)	2 (0–6)	4 (+ 1 student)/83%
Kumar et al. [17]	5 (0–10)	70 (65–82)	75 (70–80)	N.s	N.s	90 (75–100)	2 (0–6)	N.s
Everding et al. [18]	20 (0–60)	70 (50–90)	50 (0–90)	N.s	82 (15–100)	N.s	20 (0–85)	9/100%
This study	8 (0–40)	65 (15–90)	66 (5–90)	103 (92—109)	87 (45–100)	92 (88–100)	13 (1–88)	13/93%
Cumulative calculations	10 (0–60)	70 (15–90)	64 (0–90)	99 (74–104)	88 (15–100)	93 (66–100)	11 (0–88)	26 (+ 1 student)/93%