Table 2.
Post-exam evaluation that occurred 2 months post-PHM Board exam and 4 months post-PHM board review course
| In-person course (n = 112) 40 responses (36%) |
Online-only access (n = 144) 34 responses (24%) |
|
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation Statement | Mean scorea | Mean scorea |
| I would recommend this learning experience to a colleague. | 91 | 83 |
| The format of this learning experience was appropriate for its content. | 90 | 83 |
| The material presented during this learning experience met my needs. | 86 | 80 |
| This learning experience adequately prepared me to sit for the PHM board exam | 84 | 76 |
| Course’s most beneficial learning strategies | Number selectedb | Number selectedb |
| In-person lectures | 38 (95%) | n/a |
| Question bank | 29 (72.5%) | 22 (68.8%) |
| Printed course syllabus (content objectives and lecture slides) | 26 (65%) | n/a |
| Visual diagnosis questions | 24 (60%) | 15 (46.9%) |
| Recorded videos of didactics | 21 (52.5%) | 28 (87.5%) |
| Online course syllabus | 20 (50%) | 25 (78.1%) |
| Procedure checklists | 8 (20%) | 6 (18.8%) |
| Procedure/Simulation break-out sessions | 5 (12.5%) | n/a |
aScoring based on scale of 0–100 assessing agreement with statement
bParticipants could select more than one response option