Table 5.
Author (Year) | Phase | N | Dose of remimazolam | Age (years) | Primary endpoint | Comparator | Co-treatment | Location (s) | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Doi et al 202049 | IIb/III | 391 | Initial dose: 6 mg/kg/h or 12 mg/kg/h Maintenance dose: 1–2 mg/kg/h |
≥ 20 | Efficacy and safety | Propofol was started at 2.0–2.5 mg/kg, followed by 4–10 mg/kg/h | Remifentanil (0.25 and 0.5 μg/kg/min, maintained by 0.25–2.0 µg/kg/min) |
Japan | Remimazolam showed well tolerated and non-inferior to propofol in term of efficacy as a sedative for general anesthesia, but the time to LoC, recovery, and extubation were both longer than propofol |
Doi et al 202050 | III | 67 | Initial dose: 6 mg/kg/h or 12 mg/kg/h Maintenance dose: 1–2 mg/kg/h |
≥ 20 | Efficacy and safety | N/A | N/A | Japan | Remimazolam could be used safely and effectively in high-risk surgical patients (ASA Class III), time to LoC was significantly shorter with dose of 12 mg/kg/h |
Chae et al 202251 | III | 120 | Six dose groups of 0.02, 0.07, 0.12, 0.17, 0.22, and 0.27 mg/kg | >18 | Determine the ED50 and ED95 Of IV remimazolam for LoC |
N/A | N/A | Korea | A bolus injection of remimazolam can be administered safely without causing significant hemodynamic instability. The optimal doses of 0.25–0.33, 0.19–0.25, and 0.14–0.19 mg. kg-1 in 95% patients aged <40, 60–80, and >80 years |
Shimamoto et al 202252 | N/A | 76 | Initial dose: 0.2 mg/kg Maintenance dose: 1–2mg/kg/h | 20–80 | Efficacy and safety | Propofol was started at 2 mg/kg, followed by 4–10 mg/kg/h | Fentanyl citrate (3 μg/kg, maintained by remifentanil 0.25 µg/kg/min) | China | Remimazolam tosilate can provide satisfactory anesthetic effects for EVL and combination with flumazenil can induce quick recovery from anesthesia |
Abbreviations: N, number of subjects; N/A, not available/applicable.