Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2022 May 20;5(6):587–593. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2022.05.002

Table 6.

Results of negative binomial regression evaluating the association of enrollee eyecare provider type (optometrist vs ophthalmologist) with the number of visual field tests that enrollees with open angle glaucoma (OAG) received per year using the restricted dataset of only those years where a patient saw a single provider type.

Cofactor Incident rate ratioa Low 95% CI High 95% CI P value
Enrollee eyecare provider type
 Only optometrist Reference
 Only ophthalmologist 1.243 1.238 1.248 <0.001
Age (per each year older) 0.994 0.994 0.995 <0.001
Sex
 Male Reference
 Female 0.986 0.982 0.990 <0.001
Macular degenerationb 1.026 1.021 1.032 <0.001
Diabetic retinopathyc 0.921 0.913 0.929 <0.001
Number of glaucoma medication classes received
 None Reference
 1 1.098 1.091 1.104 <0.001
 2 1.202 1.194 1.209 <0.001
 ≥3 1.365 1.356 1.373 <0.001
Location of residence
 Rural Reference
 Urban 1.067 1.060 1.073 <0.001
Year of care
 Each additional year 0.965 0.964 0.965 <0.001
Undergoing incisional glaucoma surgery
 No Reference
 Yes 1.170 1.164 1.176 <0.001
a

Incident rate ratio = The adjusted ratio of the number of visual field tests for each of the cofactors listed above compared to the reference group for that cofactor. A higher incidence rate ratio indicates that patients with that cofactor received more visual field tests than those in the reference group.

b

Reference group is those without macular degeneration.

c

Reference group is those without diabetic retinopathy.