Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 17;31:100644. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100644

Table 2.

Associations between ethnicity and CGM use with level of glycaemic control.

Glucose monitoring modality and ethnicity HbA1c mmol/mol
HbA1c difference mmol/mol (comparator group - reference group)
Mean (SD) Unadjusted difference (95% CI) Fully adjusted difference (95% CI)
SMBG
 Māori (n = 88) 83·5 (19·3) 0 0
 Pacific (n = 55) 78·4 (18·8) −5·0 (−10·9, 0·8) −5·0 (−10·9, 0·9)
 Asian (n = 16) 63·2 (13·0) −20·2 (−29·4, −11·0) −16·5 (−25·6, −7·5)
 European/Other (n = 182) 68·7 (16·3) −14·7 (−19·1, −10·3) −12·1 (−16·5, −7·7)
isCGM
 Māori (n = 71) 71·9 (16·8) 0 0
 Pacific (n = 13) 75·5 (15·4) 3·5 (−6·7, 13·8) 0·7 (−9·4, 10·8)
 Asian (n = 22) 65·6 (14·8) −6·3 (−14·6, 2·0) −8·5 (−16·5, −0·4)
 European/Other (n = 343) 64·1 (13·2) −7·8 (−12·2, −3·4) −7·2 (−11·5, −2·8)
rtCGM
 Māori (n = 40) 61·8 (10·9) 0 0
 Pacific (n = 9) 69·9 (14·2) 8·1 (−4·4, 20·7) 7·8 (−4·4, 20·1)
 Asian (n = 11) 55·2 (9·4) −6·6 (−18·1, 5·0) −5·0 (−16·3, 6·3)
 European/Other (n = 242) 59·3 (10·5) −2·4 (−8·2, 3·4) −1·6 (−7·3, 4·1)

∗ Ethnicity and CGM use were associated with HbA1c in unadjusted and adjusted models (P < 0·001). Ethnicity was found to be an effect modifier on CGM use (unadjusted P = 0·002, adjusted P = 0·013); therefore, results are presented stratified by CGM use. For all other variables please see Supplementary Table 3.

∗∗ Fully adjusted HbA1c is adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, deprivation, duration of diabetes, district health board, insulin modality, and CGM use.

∗∗∗ SMBG is self-monitoring of blood glucose, isCGM is intermittently scanned CGM, and rtCGM is real-time CGM.