Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 13;17:100491. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2022.100491

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Cell migration of hGFs on JEM membranes. (a and b) Representative images and quantitative analysis of hGFs on JEM(+), JEM(−), and control membranes at 24 ​h in the transwell assay. The scale bar in a is 200 ​μm, n ​= ​6. (c) qRT-PCR analysis of migration-related gene expression (FAK, FN1, and COLI), n ​= ​9. (d and e) Western blot analysis of migration-related proteins (FAK, FN1, and COL I) in hGFs on JEM(+), JEM(−), and control membranes at 24 ​h, n ​= ​6. ∗p ​< ​0.05, compared with Control; #p ​< ​0.05, compared with JEM(+). Statistically significant differences (p ​< ​0.05) were measured using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) combined with the Student–Newman–Keuls (SNK) multiple comparison post hoc test.