Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 3;72(6):853–858. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2022.04.010

Table 3.

Comparison of DMF and COHIP-SF19 scores and its subscales by the presence of fluorosis (N = 1125).

Mean SD P value
DMF score No DF 1.48 2.66 .003**
Mild DF 1.67 2.93
Moderate-severe DF 3.37 4.80
DS No DF 1.19 2.16 .002**
Mild DF 1.29 2.32
Moderate-severe DF 2.50 3.29
Oral health well-being subscale No DF 15.03 4.56 .230
Mild DF 14.77 4.33
Moderate-severe DF 13.90 4.60
Functional well-being subscale No DF 14.42 2.88 .786
Mild DF 14.27 2.96
Moderate-severe DF 14.57 2.75
Socioemotional well-being subscale No DF 32.76 8.29 .030*
Mild DF 31.70 7.64
Moderate-severe DF 31.04 8.33
COHIP-SF19 No DF 62.46 12.50 .028*
Mild DF 60.67 12.46
Moderate-severe DF 58.38 12.44

Kruskal–Wallis U test was conducted to compare subgroups.

P ≤ .05.

⁎⁎

P ≤ 0.01. ***P ≤ .001.

CODS, number of decayed surfaces; COHIP-SF19, Child Oral Health Impact Profile–Short Version 19; DF, dental fluorosis; DMF, decayed, missing, and filled surfaces; DS, decayed surfaces.