Skip to main content
. 2022 May 17;72(6):773–778. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2022.03.004

Table 2.

Silver diamine fluoride (SDF), fluoride, and silver applied according to the brands and sizes of the dental micro-applicators.

Brand Size Applicator's tip diameter (mm), mean ± SD SDF applied amount (mg), mean ± SD Fluoride applied to tooth (mg), mean ± SD Silver applied to tooth (mg), mean ± SD
SDI Regular 2.76 ± 0.02a 6.60 ± 1.96a 0.30 ± 0.09 1.68 ± 0.50
3M Regular 2.60 ± 0.07b 4.50 ± 1.09a, b 0.20 ± 0.05 1.14 ± 0.28
Premium Plus* Regular 2.53 ± 0.02c 5.60 ± 1.61b, c 0.25 ± 0.07 1.42 ± 0.41
Elevate Oral Care Regular 2.51 ± 0.01cd 4.23 ± 0.69 c 0.19 ± 0.03 1.07 ± 0.17
Dentsply Regular 2.48 ± 0.02d 3.78 ± 0.92c, d 0.17 ± 0.04 0.96 ± 0.23
Premium Plus* Fine 2.04 ± 0.01e 3.83 ± 0.57c, d 0.17 ± 0.03 0.97 ± 0.15
Elevate Oral Care Small 2.01 ± 0.04e 3.87 ± 0.77c, d 0.17 ± 0.03 0.98 ± 0.19
SDI Fine 1.89 ± 0.02f 3.00 ± 1.26d 0.13 ± 0.06 0.76 ± 0.32

Tukey's post hoc analysis: Each subscript letter denotes a subset of group categories whose column means do not differ significantly from one another at the .05 level (the same column mean was named by a lowercase letter, such as a, b, c, d, e, or f).