Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 20;36(2):347–375. doi: 10.1007/s11145-022-10388-x

Table 4.

M(SD) of standard language and literacy scores by group by time point

Vocabulary Phonological Awareness
M (SD) t df p d M (SD) t df p d
Full sample
 T1 106.85 (18.66) 5.38 227 < .001 .51 10.69 (2.91) 1.59 231 .11 − .15
 T2 111.77 (17.78) 10.46 (3.04)
English monolingual
 T1 114.13 (15.51) .69 226 .494 .06 10.05 (2.80) − 2.05 230 .042 − .19
 T2 115.10 (14.55) 9.59 (3.00)
Spanish bilingual
 T1 100.15 (19.18) 4.09 226 < .001 .39 10.82 (3.20) − .78 231 .439 − .07
 T2 106.69 (18.98) 10.62 (3.06)
Chinese bilingual
 T1 104.02 (18.86) 5.21 226 < .001 .49 11.43 (2.55) .28 230 .783 .03
 T2 112.65 (19.44) 11.51 (2.74)
Word reading Passage comprehension
Full sample
 T1 108.17 (17.33) 2.22 228 .027 .21 102.17 (14.62) − 2.07 210 .040 − .20
 T2 109.69 (17.19) 100.58 (14.58)
English monolingual
 T1 104.17 (16.86) 1.06 227 .292 .10 100.00 (15.64) .49 209 .622 .05
 T2 105.32 (17.93) 100.59 (13.65)
Spanish bilingual
 T1 108.58 (18.95) .24 227 .811 .02 100.13 (14.26) − 2.83 209 .005 − .28
 T2 108.88 (17.43) 96.21 (15.04)
Chinese bilingual
 T1 113.38 (14.70) 2.66 227 .008 .25 107.14 (12.37) − 1.58 209 .115 − .16
 T2 116.80 (13.36) 104.95 (14.24)

T1: Time 1; T2: Time 2; p values indicated the paired simple effects between T1 and T2 task performance for each group based on respective linear mixed-effects regressions. The statistics split by language group should be thresholded under Bonferroni correction at .017 for three multiple comparisons (the full sample statistics do not apply)