Table 4.
Estimation results for the impact of investor sentiment.
| Organizational performance (ROA) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Random-effect, Model 3 | Fixed-effect, Model 4 | |
| −0.000 (0.000) | 0.759 (0.241) | |
| 0.042*** (0.004) | 0.058*** (0.004) | |
| 0.078*** (0.003) | 0.109*** (0.004) | |
| −0.180*** (0.007) | −0.192*** (0.011) | |
| 0.080*** (0.008) | 0.045*** (0.012) | |
| −0.095*** (0.011) | −0.045*** (0.014) | |
| −0.031*** (0.008) | 0.051*** (0.009) | |
| 0.005*** (0.000) | 0.015*** (0.001) | |
| −0.405**** (0.033) | 0.621*** (0.030) | |
| 0.679*** (0.013) | 0.717*** (0.016) | |
| Categorical variable | _ | |
| _ | _ | |
| Cons | 28.680 (24.984) | 5.561*** (0.239) |
| : Within | 0.694 | 0.751 |
| : Between | 0.711 | 0.664 |
| : Overall | 0.673 | 0.623 |
***p < 0.01; **p < 0.05. According to the Hausman test, (10) = 845.83, p < 0.05. Hence, the fixed-effect model fit the data set better than random-effect model.