Table 5.
Estimation results for moderating role of investor sentiment.
| Organizational performance (ROA) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Random-effect, Model 5 | Fixed-effect, Model 6 | |
| −0.098*** (0.005) | −0.161*** (0.007) | |
| 0.001*** (0.000) | −0.150 (0.284) | |
| * | 0.000 (0.000) | 0.000*** (0.000) |
| 0.045*** (0.004) | 0.049*** (0.005) | |
| 0.084*** (0.004) | 0.085*** (0.004) | |
| −0.190*** (0.009) | −0.253*** (0.015) | |
| 0.096*** (0.010) | 0.065*** (0.016) | |
| −0.090*** (0.012) | 0.005 (0.016) | |
| −0.035*** (0.009) | −0.012 (0.011) | |
| 0.005*** (0.000) | 0.006*** (0.001) | |
| −0.389**** (0.036) | −0.525*** (0.042) | |
| 0.662*** (0.015) | 0.670*** (0.018) | |
| Categorical variable | _ | |
| _ | _ | |
| Cons | 4.855*** (0.153) | 5.404*** (0.256) |
| : Within | 0.685 | 0.694 |
| : Between | 0.719 | 0.773 |
| : Overall | 0.668 | 0.739 |
***p < 0.01; **p < 0.05. According to the Hausman test, (12) = 274.68, p < 0.05. Hence, the fixed-effect model fit the data set better than random-effect model.